FEDERAL

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 5. Agreements Between Fannie Mae and Bank of America ($ billions) Agreement Representation and Warranty Settlement Cash “Make-Whole” Payment Settlement Cash Proceeds $3.6 Repurchases 6.7 Total Representation and Warranty Settlement Compensatory Fees for Failure to Meet Delinquency Timelines Transfer of Mortgage Servicing Rights 10.3 1.3 No funds to or from Fannie Mae Total $11.6 servicing rights on about 1.1 million mortgages from Bank of America to other servicers. When approving the settlement, FHFA employed a new policy governing the review of repurchase claim settlements that it developed in part as a response to an earlier OIG evaluation and recommendation. 2 Because FHFA’s policy applied to one, but not all, portions of the settlement, the 2013 settlement enabled OIG to evaluate FHFA’s oversight under its settlement policy in the context of its oversight of matters that fell outside of that policy. OIG found that FHFA adhered to its new policy when reviewing the settlement of repurchase claims between Fannie Mae and Bank of America. This policy did not apply, however, to the resolution of claims related to servicing penalties or the transfer of mortgage servicing rights (MSR). Consequently, FHFA’s consideration of these aspects of the settlement did not benefit from an established review process. OIG recommended that FHFA establish a formal review process for claims related to servicing deficiencies and significant MSR transfers. FHFA agreed with this recommendation and committed to establish guidelines by January 31, 2014. Fannie Mae’s Compliance with FHFA Email Retention Requirements (EVL-2013-011, August 16, 2013) In November 2011, while conducting an investigation, OIG special agents learned that although Fannie Mae permanently retained the email of most employees in sensitive positions, it automatically deleted the unsaved email of other employees after 60 days. In October 2012, FHFA directed Fannie Mae to immediately begin saving all employee email records and establish and implement a corporate five-year email retention policy. OIG reviewed Fannie Mae’s compliance with the email retention directive and confirmed that the enterprise is now in compliance. OIG will continue to monitor FHFA’s oversight of the enterprises’ email retention practices and records management policies to ensure that they fulfill their intended purposes. FHFA’s Oversight of the Federal Home Loan Banks’ Compliance with Regulatory Limits on Extensions of Unsecured Credit (EVL-2013-008, August 6, 2013) In addition to making secured loans, known as advances, to member financial institutions, the FHLBanks extend short-term, unsecured credit to domestic and foreign-owned financial institutions. In June 2012, we reported that some FHLBanks followed potentially risky unsecured credit management practices, including undertaking large exposures to counterparties located in the financially troubled Eurozone. 3 Furthermore, we found that some FHLBanks violated FHFA’s regulatory limits on unsecured credit extensions. We recommended that FHFA: (1) assess the extent of such violations in its 2012 horizontal review of unsecured credit risk Semiannual Report to the Congress • April 1, 2013–September 30, 2013 13
Figure 6. FHFA’s Supervisory Actions Taken in Response to Unsecured Credit Violations FHLBank Violations Supervisory Action Remediation Date FHLBank A 474 MRA 3/31/2013 FHLBank B 201 Primary, 201 Secondary MRA 12/31/2012 FHLBank C 33 a MRA 3/31/2013 FHLBank D 9 MRA 10/31/2012 FHLBank E 6 MRA 3/31/2013 FHLBank F 1 Primary, 1 Secondary MRA 12/31/2012 FHLBank G 1 Violation 9/30/2012 a FHFA determined that FHLBank C’s aggregate term extensions of credit to two counterparties exceeded the regulatory limits for a combined total of 33 months, 15 months of which are attributable to one counterparty and 18 months of which are attributable to the other. The number of individual transactions in excess of the regulation is likely higher. management practices and (2) consider revising its regulations to mitigate associated risks. In this follow-up evaluation, we assessed FHFA’s (1) implementation of the 2012 horizontal review and (2) supervisory and enforcement responses to identified violations. We found that FHFA conducted a proactive and thorough review that identified over 900 unsecured credit violations at seven FHLBanks and risk management deficiencies at the other five. We also found that FHFA’s responses to the violations at the seven FHLBanks were consistent with its policy. The agency issued matters requiring attention (MRAs), among other actions, requiring the banks to remediate deficiencies within specified time periods. See Figure 6 (above) for a list of FHFA’s supervisory actions in response to FHLBank unsecured credit violations. As FHFA began to monitor compliance with MRAs, however, it found that one FHLBank had difficulty implementing the required remedies. Although FHFA had not yet decided on a supervisory strategy for the FHLBank, the case shows the importance of continued, diligent monitoring and enforcement of compliance with MRAs and other requirements. We recommended that FHFA assess the FHLBanks’ compliance with its unsecured credit supervisory requirements during the 2013 and 2014 examination cycles, and take enforcement actions as required to ensure that corrective and remedial actions are implemented over time. FHFA agreed with these recommendations. FHFA’s Oversight of Capital Markets Human Capital (ESR-2013-007, August 2, 2013) The enterprises’ combined capital markets businesses, which include their funding, hedging, and investment activities, manage portfolios of more than $1.1 trillion of mortgage-related assets. Although generally profitable, certain elements of these businesses have incurred tens of billions of dollars in losses since September 2008, the start of FHFA’s conservatorships. For this reason, we initiated a series of evaluations relating to FHFA’s supervision of the enterprises’ capital markets businesses. This evaluation began after the enterprises disclosed concerns about voluntary attrition among employees with specialized skills in their 2011 annual filings. Since the start of the conservatorships, voluntary attrition of staff with specialized skills has risen markedly. However, as of late 2012, human capital risk posed by such attrition, while still a concern, appears to have dissipated. Specifically, the Fannie Mae group that manages the enterprise’s investment activity saw a rise in its rate of voluntary attrition from January 2010 to September 2012, but the group grew over the same period, suggesting that the human capital risks posed by the increase in attrition rate were mitigated. The attrition rate for Freddie Mac’s investment management group also rose from 14 Federal Housing Finance Agency Office of Inspector General
Page 2 and 3: Federal Housing Finance Agency Offi
Page 4 and 5: Section 3: Lessons for Housing Fina
Page 6 and 7: OIG’s Accomplishments from 2010 t
Page 8 and 9: A Message from the Acting Inspector
Page 10 and 11: insures mortgages against credit lo
Page 12 and 13: Semiannual Report to the Congress
Page 14 and 15: in a number of criminal and civil i
Page 16 and 17: Figure 3. Scoring of Investor Quali
Page 18 and 19: and provide for financial consequen
Page 22 and 23: 2010 to 2012, but the attrition rat
Page 24 and 25: Figure 8. Estimated Enterprise Aggr
Page 26 and 27: operations that pose the greatest r
Page 28 and 29: poor financial condition, Appalachi
Page 30 and 31: fraud and wire fraud involving a fi
Page 32 and 33: This was a joint investigation with
Page 34 and 35: y falsified, forged, and altered do
Page 36 and 37: Short Sale Schemes A short sale occ
Page 38 and 39: This was a joint investigation with
Page 40 and 41: at Appalachian concealed past due l
Page 42 and 43: indemnification payments that OIG p
Page 44 and 45: the SEC, and others. In July 2013,
Page 46 and 47: Figure 10. Overview of the Enterpri
Page 48 and 49: Figure 12. Enterprises’ Annual Ne
Page 50 and 51: Figure 14. Home Price Index 2011 Th
Page 52 and 53: educe the principal balance of Trea
Page 54 and 55: Figure 17. FHLBanks’ Net Income f
Page 56 and 57: multifamily housing lending busines
Page 58 and 59: The bill would replace the enterpri
Page 60 and 61: mortgage credit. For its part, the
Page 62 and 63: Figure 20. Reform Models and Reform
Page 64 and 65: Multifamily We have also found indi
Page 66 and 67: Based on recent history, a reformed
Page 68 and 69: Figure 26. The Mortgage Servicing P
Page 70 and 71:
Even though the FHFA senior examine
Page 72 and 73:
assistance to homeowners and to use
Page 74 and 75:
positive NPV, then the servicer is
Page 76 and 77:
Siloed Practices: Harmonizing Busin
Page 78 and 79:
Semiannual Report to the Congress
Page 80 and 81:
overseen by FHFA. As conservator, F
Page 82 and 83:
Interest Rate Swap: An interest rat
Page 84 and 85:
References Federal Deposit Insuranc
Page 86 and 87:
Department of the Treasury Financia
Page 88 and 89:
Acronyms and Abbreviations Agency A
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Figure 29. Summary of OIG Recommend
Page 94 and 95:
No. Recommendation Report Status AU
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
No. Recommendation Report Status EV
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Audit and Evaluation Reports with R
Page 116 and 117:
Appendix D: OIG Reports See www.fhf
Page 118 and 119:
Appendix F: Description of OIG Offi
Page 120 and 121:
Strategic Goal 2—Operating with I
Page 122 and 123:
Figure 17. Federal Home Loan Banks
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
15 Federal Housing Finance Agency,
Page 128 and 129:
33 Fannie Mae, “Multifamily Busin
Page 130 and 131:
Federal Home Loan Banks Office of F
Page 132 and 133:
to FHFA Scorecard Directive, at 48,
Page 134 and 135:
it is preferable to limit our discu
Page 136 and 137:
Position in the Housing Finance Sys
Page 138 and 139:
144 Fannie Mae, “Comparison of Mu
Page 140 and 141:
157 Id., “Mortgage Servicing,”
Page 142 and 143:
184 Federal Housing Finance Agency,
Page 144 and 145:
Transparency and Certainty for Lend
show all

FEDERAL

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?