13.12.2015 Views

Mathur Ritika Passi

zVAWsQ

zVAWsQ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

national priorities. However, it must also<br />

be acknowledged that the targets associated<br />

with the goal are extremely ambitious.<br />

Due to the use of phrases like ‘end all forms<br />

of discrimination’ and ‘eliminate all forms<br />

of violence,’ the targets are likely to serve<br />

as lofty ideals that India could strive to<br />

achieve in the next 15 years.<br />

This is not to say that the targets in general<br />

are impossible to achieve. But in order<br />

to do so, the need for adequate financing<br />

must be addressed explicitly. As estimated<br />

by Organization for Economic Cooperation<br />

and Development’s GenderNet, 23 in<br />

2012-13 only 5% of total international<br />

aid was dedicated towards the principle<br />

cause of gender equality. Further, the Addis<br />

Ababa Action Agenda adopted at the third<br />

Financing for Development conference in<br />

Ethiopia in July 2015 has received mixed<br />

reactions from women’s rights activists who<br />

feel that, although the major funding gap in<br />

gender was recognised, no specific commitment<br />

was achieved. 24 Therefore, in addition<br />

to relying on traditional funding avenues<br />

of international aid and taxation-oriented<br />

domestic funding, India needs to invest in<br />

gender-responsive budgeting and gender<br />

mainstreaming in design of all projects in<br />

order to maximise the impact of its own resources<br />

towards achieving gender equality. 25<br />

At the same time, in order for India to<br />

measure its progress towards gender equality<br />

relative to the SDG-specific indicators,<br />

its own inability to as of yet measure<br />

gender inequality accurately is a critical<br />

impediment. While target 5.2 dedicated to<br />

eliminating violence against women is a<br />

top national priority, some of the proposed<br />

indicators to measure the progress towards<br />

this target may not be feasible for populous<br />

developing countries like India, at least<br />

under present data-collection mechanisms.<br />

Measuring violence entails several ethical<br />

and methodological issues. One of the<br />

proposed indicators—“prevalence of girls<br />

and women 15-49 who have experienced<br />

physical or sexual violence by an intimate<br />

partner in the last 12 months”—prescribes<br />

surveying all women between a vast age<br />

group over a specific time period. Another<br />

suggested indicator—“percentage of women<br />

and men who report feeling safe walking<br />

alone at night in the city or area where<br />

they live”—may be too vague to quantify<br />

through present data-collection systems.<br />

The use of technology and innovative<br />

gender-sensitive data-collection techniques<br />

are still new to India, but need to be incorporated<br />

at a large scale in the future.<br />

Additionally, the zero draft outcome report<br />

recommends evaluation of progress made<br />

in the implementation of the SDG targets<br />

every four years. 26 While India has long<br />

been collecting data in the form of decadal,<br />

annual and ministry-specific national sample<br />

surveys, it must invest more in the collection<br />

of sex-disaggregated data, 27 which<br />

includes separate data collection and<br />

analysis for men and women. Such analysis<br />

involves qualitative surveys into issues of<br />

ownership and decision-making between<br />

men and women within households; this<br />

can prove essential in assessing India’s<br />

standing vis-à-vis SDG 5 indicators.<br />

The ability to accurately measure progress<br />

against the set indicators would also contribute<br />

in strengthening the accountability<br />

of the SDG agenda. The MDGs lacked in<br />

their focus on monitoring, evaluation and<br />

accountability; 28 the SDGs, in contrast, have<br />

more focus on monitoring and evaluation<br />

but remain unclear on accountability. Given<br />

India’s size and its federal political system,<br />

huge regional variations exist in the country<br />

in terms of demographics and state-specific<br />

legislations. Monitoring efforts and initiatives<br />

can help identify best practices across<br />

the country. But the Indian government is<br />

unlikely to commit to officially reporting to<br />

the UN. Hence, a people-centric mechanism<br />

for monitoring, evaluation, and consequent<br />

accountability is essential to ensure consistent<br />

progress towards the targets.<br />

The post-2015 agenda is inclusive and<br />

ambitious. Its successful implementation<br />

has the potential to transform the world<br />

by 2030. However, its success depends<br />

on learning from the MDG experience as<br />

well as on issues of financing, monitoring,<br />

evaluation and accountability. That said,<br />

the gender SDG can prove to be crucial<br />

in bringing solution-oriented attention to<br />

areas of concern in India, and can be integrated<br />

perfectly within the country’s current<br />

policy environment.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!