13.12.2015 Views

Mathur Ritika Passi

zVAWsQ

zVAWsQ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

is little option except to pursue a common<br />

agenda for optimising outcomes.<br />

India is also at the cusp of emerging as<br />

a leading economic power. Projected<br />

growth rates in the Indian economy over<br />

the medium term are higher than the seven<br />

economies of US, China, Japan, Germany,<br />

France, UK and Italy, which are bigger than<br />

India in terms of current Gross National<br />

Income. By 2030 India could be the third<br />

largest economy after the US and China. It<br />

will most certainly be the most populous<br />

country by then. This is why India matters in<br />

the global economy and polity.<br />

There are two imperatives that will drive<br />

India to do more than be just an active<br />

participant in the metrics of the SDGs over<br />

the next 15 years.<br />

Define World Development Practice for the<br />

21st Century<br />

The SDGs are a complex set of goals,<br />

with conflicting objectives, which need<br />

to be balanced. The need for rapid<br />

economic growth to end poverty and the<br />

conflicting objective of reducing inequality<br />

are examples. But the contradictions<br />

they present are not the outcome of<br />

poor or fanciful drafting. They represent<br />

developmental challenges which have defied<br />

resolution. Inequality, accretions of wealth<br />

and income at the very top seem to be<br />

the natural outcome of the most effective<br />

market-driven model of growth we know<br />

today.<br />

India should embrace such challenges.<br />

The developmental path that we adopt<br />

can provide valuable lessons, not least in<br />

Africa, which is expected to be the growth<br />

leader post 2050. By then India would have<br />

peaked, just as China is peaking today.<br />

Resolve Domestic Institutional Gaps<br />

Despite India’s robust institutional<br />

framework, an experienced and relatively<br />

effective bureaucracy, and our embedded<br />

commitment and preference for a democratic<br />

polity, we suffer from significant gaps in our<br />

institutional architecture.<br />

These gaps include:<br />

(a) Institutional resistance to work in<br />

teams across silos resulting in functional<br />

INDIA SHOULD EMBRACE THE<br />

DEVELOPMENTAL CHALLENGES<br />

THAT HAVE THUS FAR DEFIED<br />

RESOLUTION: THE DEVELOPMENT<br />

PATH THAT WE ADOPT CAN PROVIDE<br />

VALUABLE LESSONS TO AFRICA<br />

FOR INSTANCE—AFRICA WILL BE A<br />

GROWTH LEADER POST 2050, BY<br />

WHICH TIME INDIA WILL<br />

HAVE PEAKED.<br />

duplication, territoriality and a preference<br />

for hierarchical structures over efficiency.<br />

This is an outcome of “soft” budget<br />

constraints, which permit inefficiencies<br />

to persist; centralisation of powers,<br />

which stifles initiative; and low levels of<br />

accountability, which provide no incentives<br />

to pursue tough reform measures.<br />

(b) Over reliance on legislating a solution<br />

rather than solving problems upfront. The<br />

low productivity of government employment<br />

is a good example. Low access to good<br />

quality electricity supply despite two<br />

legislative attempts in 1998 and again in<br />

2003 is another.<br />

(c) Less than adequate innovation and<br />

misdirected research and development.<br />

This reflects in our failure to indigenise<br />

international quality products and partner in<br />

global supply chains.<br />

The SDGs are an opportunity to tackle<br />

these institutional gaps head on through the<br />

following measures.<br />

Use the NITI Aayog Productively<br />

The responsibility of monitoring the SDGs<br />

is likely to be vested in the newly formed<br />

NITI Aayog—the successor of the erstwhile<br />

Planning Commission—which has been<br />

seeking a definitive mandate. This would be<br />

sub-optimal. The NITI Aayog was formed<br />

as a high-powered think tank providing<br />

targeted expert advice to the Union and<br />

state governments. Monitoring the SDGs<br />

is a clunky task, which requires systems,<br />

qualified professionals and a great deal of<br />

coordination within the ministries of the<br />

Union government, for which the Aayog is<br />

an unsuitable institution. This task would<br />

best remain with the Ministry of Statistics,<br />

which already monitors the MDGs.<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!