13.12.2015 Views

Mathur Ritika Passi

zVAWsQ

zVAWsQ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in the open despite having access to toilets,<br />

such as perceived convenience and comfort<br />

of openly defecating, and path dependency<br />

on the age-old practice. 28 These factors<br />

override the rationale of health and safety<br />

benefits that accrue from using toilets.<br />

While the dynamic political leadership has<br />

managed to build much-needed awareness<br />

and momentum towards the sanitation<br />

goal through the Swachh Bharat Mission,<br />

continuous outreach communication, mass<br />

social mobilisation and targeted efforts<br />

at awareness creation will be required to<br />

sustain change in the existing situation.<br />

Capitalising on SDG 6<br />

The water and sanitation SDG seems<br />

promising and complements Indian<br />

national efforts of revising strategies and<br />

creating awareness to achieve total water<br />

and sanitation. In contrast to the MDGs,<br />

where water and sanitation were put as<br />

a quantitative target within the broader<br />

framework of environment sustainability,<br />

the SDGs include a separate goal to “ensure<br />

availability and sustainable management<br />

of water and sanitation for all.” 29 The<br />

goal further expands on the scope and<br />

potential of MDGs by encompassing targets<br />

on water resources management, water<br />

quality, capacity building and inclusive<br />

participation. In all, SDG 6 includes eight<br />

targets.<br />

Targets 6.1 and 6.2 aim to achieve<br />

universal access to safe drinking water and<br />

eradication of open defecation by 2030.<br />

These two targets complement and extend<br />

beyond the timeline of the Indian strategy<br />

on water and sanitation (2011-2022).<br />

While target 6.3 deals with improving<br />

water quality, waste water management,<br />

recycling and reusing, target 6.4 seeks<br />

to “substantially increase water-use<br />

efficiency” across all sectors and reduce<br />

water scarcity. These targets address the<br />

Indian challenge of water availability for<br />

drinking purposes. As mentioned above,<br />

the strategic document on water mentions<br />

depleting groundwater resources and<br />

chemical contamination of water bodies,<br />

which directly affect quantity and quality<br />

of water available for drinking and other<br />

basic purposes. Consequently, source<br />

sustainability, including both quality and<br />

quantity of water, is treated as an urgent<br />

and critical need. Water-use efficiency has<br />

received attention in the Indian National<br />

Water Policy, 2012, especially in the context<br />

of industrial water. The government also<br />

plans to create a Bureau of Water Use<br />

Efficiency to regulate, monitor and improve<br />

water use across industrial, agriculture,<br />

potable water, power generation and urban<br />

domestic environs. The target envisaged is<br />

improving water-use efficiency by 20%. 30<br />

While expanding on the erstwhile MDG<br />

target, SDG targets 6.3 and 6.4 lack specific<br />

metrics or quantitative targets. Calling for<br />

substantial increase in water-use efficiency<br />

can be considered vague and will likely<br />

create difficulty in assessing this target.<br />

Likewise, the other two targets on<br />

integrated water resources management<br />

(6.5) and water-related ecosystem<br />

conservation goal (6.6) have a prescribed<br />

timeline (till 2030), but again lack<br />

specificity in proposing a quantitative<br />

measure against which progress can be<br />

measured. This is understandable given<br />

the nature of the target. Integrated water<br />

resources management (IWRM) and<br />

ecosystem conservation are contextspecific<br />

topics, and demand intense<br />

institutional, political, economic and<br />

judicial interventions. In India, IWRM<br />

is a problematic approach, influenced<br />

by political overtures. States have the<br />

autonomy to decide on the use and<br />

management of the river flowing within<br />

their administrative boundaries. There<br />

exists a series of historic interstate water<br />

disputes that still remain unresolved and<br />

cannot be disregarded. IWRM requires<br />

disentangling land rights from water rights,<br />

defining entitlements, equitable allocation<br />

and inclusive participation. In effect, it<br />

calls for radical social and political change<br />

in the way water is economically and<br />

socially valued. On the other hand, target<br />

6.6, which proposes an ecosystem basin<br />

approach, is a step beyond IWRM but is<br />

more economically, politically and socially<br />

feasible. However, currently these two<br />

targets do not necessarily align with Indian<br />

national priorities and their implementation<br />

may depend mostly on the discrete work<br />

carried out by large and small civil society<br />

groups and international non-government<br />

organisations.<br />

Of the two last targets, the first (6.a) calls<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!