17.01.2016 Views

THE SHIITE JIHAD IN SYRIA AND ITS REGIONAL EFFECTS

PolicyFocus138-v3

PolicyFocus138-v3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 n <strong>THE</strong> <strong>SHIITE</strong> <strong>JIHAD</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>SYRIA</strong><br />

during the U.S. occupation of Iraq. 302 With the June 2014 ISIS advance, it<br />

would appear that many of these nefarious activities, including human rights<br />

abuses, are being continued in earnest. 303<br />

With these developments in mind, the rise of Shiite militias in Syria and<br />

Iraq, and their sponsorship by Iran, must be considered in reorienting a U.S.<br />

policy to address the entire complicated region. Some realistic, as well as easily<br />

integrated and promoted, steps to counter Shiite militias’ influence include<br />

the following:<br />

• refocused analyses. Iranian proxy organizations should not be<br />

viewed as atomized entities. Instead, they should be recognized as subnetworks<br />

of a broader IRGC–Qods Force network and part and parcel of a<br />

larger regional strategy. This is especially the case for AAH and the Badr<br />

Organization. Both have direct links to new and established Shiite armed<br />

groups, including designated terrorist organizations such as Kataib Hezbollah.<br />

Mapping and potentially classifying these organizations will require<br />

creative methods to account for their sharing of members, equipment, ideological<br />

goals, and command structures. In particular, if new organizations<br />

or front groups are ever designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations,<br />

their overlapping nature must be addressed. Assessments of these organizations,<br />

the threats they pose to U.S. and regional security, and their activities<br />

should be intrinsically linked in any future U.S. negotiations with Iran<br />

and regional allies.<br />

• interdiction of online recruitment. By focusing on high-tech<br />

platforms, the United States can potentially disrupt the continuing<br />

Internet recruitment techniques run by designated terrorist groups and<br />

unregistered militias. The urgency of such an effort is underlined by the<br />

high likelihood of additional Western citizens being either recruited by<br />

militias or used for fundraising purposes. Denying militias freedom of<br />

operation in the social media space could be a cost-effective and productive<br />

step toward reducing their general clout. Since social media recruitment<br />

is now being expanded to attract fighters throughout the Middle<br />

East, South Asia, and the West, the United States must work closely with<br />

international partners to counter and monitor these efforts.<br />

• counternarratives. As the United States steps up efforts against<br />

ISIS, it should be simultaneously concerned about the proliferation of<br />

official and semiofficial narratives being cast by Shiite militias. Many

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!