26.01.2016 Views

Diagnosis and Management of Infantile Hemangioma

Xxbjh

Xxbjh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 19. Key resolution outcomes in studies comparing timolol <strong>and</strong> observation or placebo<br />

(continued)<br />

Author,<br />

Year<br />

Comparison<br />

Groups (n)<br />

Quality<br />

Chambers et<br />

al. 2012 144<br />

G1: Timolol<br />

maleate gel<br />

0.25% (13)<br />

G2:<br />

Observation<br />

(10)<br />

Quality: Fair<br />

Yu et al.<br />

2013 103<br />

G1: Timolol ,<br />

topical,<br />

drops three<br />

times<br />

daily(101)<br />

G2:<br />

Observation<br />

(23)<br />

Age, Months<br />

Type<br />

Age,<br />

mean±SD<br />

G1: 4.8<br />

G2: 3.7<br />

Type, n<br />

Superficial<br />

G1: 5<br />

G2: 4<br />

Mixed<br />

G1: 7<br />

G2: 5<br />

Deep<br />

G1: 1<br />

G2: 1<br />

Age<br />

1-6 months<br />

G1+G2: 88<br />

7-12 months<br />

G1 +G2: 36<br />

Type, %<br />

Superficial:<br />

100<br />

Location<br />

Periocular<br />

(100%)<br />

G1+G2:<br />

multiple<br />

Methods <strong>and</strong><br />

Measures <strong>of</strong><br />

Resolution/<br />

Response<br />

• Photographs<br />

• Response<br />

categorized as<br />

good (lesion<br />

decreased by<br />

more than 50%<br />

size), moderate<br />

(lesion<br />

decreased by<br />

50% or less)<br />

<strong>and</strong> poor (lesion<br />

enlarged or<br />

caused ptosis or<br />

induced<br />

astigmatism<br />

• Reviewed by<br />

blinded pediatric<br />

ophthalmologist<br />

• Photographs<br />

• Categorized as:<br />

Class 1:<br />

ineffective<br />

Class 2:<br />

controlled<br />

growth<br />

Class 3:<br />

promoted<br />

regression<br />

• Blinded<br />

assessment: NR<br />

Resolution<br />

Outcomes<br />

Response to<br />

treatment, n (%)<br />

Good<br />

G1: 8 (61)<br />

G2: 0<br />

Moderate<br />

G1: 4 (31)<br />

G2: 1 (10)<br />

Poor<br />

G1: 1 (8)<br />

G2: 9 (90)<br />

G1 vs.G2 p=0.001<br />

Response to<br />

treatment, n (%)<br />

Class 1<br />

G1: 8 (7.9)<br />

G2: 15 (65.2)<br />

Class 2<br />

G1: 36 (35.6)<br />

G2: 7 (30.4)<br />

Class 3<br />

Quality:<br />

G1: 57 (56.4)<br />

Poor<br />

G2: 1 (4.3)<br />

G = group; IH = infantile hemangioma; n = number; NR = not reported; SD = st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation<br />

Rebound<br />

Growth/<br />

Recurrence, n<br />

(%)<br />

NR<br />

In 12 patients<br />

with complete<br />

resolution, no<br />

regrowth noted<br />

at 3-5 month<br />

followup<br />

Timolol Ophthalmic Solution Versus Imiquimod Cream<br />

One fair quality retrospective cohort study evaluated imiquimod cream versus timolol<br />

ophthalmic solution for treatment <strong>of</strong> superficial proliferating IH (Table 20). 105 There were 40<br />

treated IH among the participants. The mean duration <strong>of</strong> therapy was 4.6 months in the<br />

imiquimod group <strong>and</strong> 4.3 months in the timolol group. Duration <strong>of</strong> followup was not reported.<br />

The VAS score <strong>and</strong> change in the hemangioma activity score did not differ significantly between<br />

the two groups.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!