26.01.2016 Views

Diagnosis and Management of Infantile Hemangioma

Xxbjh

Xxbjh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 12. Resolution outcomes in studies comparing intralesional propranolol <strong>and</strong> triamcinolone<br />

Rebound<br />

Resolution Growth/<br />

Age, Months<br />

Outcomes Recurrence<br />

Author, Year<br />

Comparison Groups<br />

(n)<br />

Quality<br />

Awadein et al. 2011 130<br />

G1: Propranolol,<br />

intralesional 1mg/ml<br />

(12)<br />

G2: Triamcinolone,<br />

intralesional<br />

40mg/ml(10)<br />

Quality: Poor<br />

Type<br />

Age,<br />

mean±SD<br />

G1: 5.9±2.7<br />

G2: 6.1±2.9<br />

Type<br />

NR<br />

Location<br />

G1+G2:<br />

Periocular<br />

Methods <strong>and</strong><br />

Measures <strong>of</strong><br />

Resolution/<br />

Response<br />

• Size measured<br />

by clinical<br />

examination<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

photography<br />

• Response<br />

graded as:<br />

Excellentcomplete<br />

resolution<br />

achieved<br />

Goodsustained<br />

plateau with ≥<br />

50% reduction<br />

Fair-sustained<br />

plateau with <<br />

50% reduction<br />

Poor-no<br />

response or<br />

worsening<br />

• Blinded<br />

assessment:<br />

NR<br />

Regression <strong>of</strong> IH<br />

G1:10/12 (83%)<br />

G2: 8/10 (80%)<br />

Response<br />

Excellent<br />

response<br />

G1:5/12 (42%)<br />

G2: 4/10 (40%)<br />

Good<br />

G1:3/12 (25%)<br />

G2: 2/10 (20%)<br />

Fair<br />

G1:2/12 (17%)<br />

G2: 2/10 (20%)<br />

Poor<br />

G1:2/12 (17%)<br />

G2: 2/10 (20%)<br />

Other<br />

Outcomes<br />

Rebound<br />

growth, n<br />

G1:4<br />

G2: 3<br />

Abbreviations: G = group; IH = infantile hemangioma; mg = milligram; ml = milliliter; n= number; NR = not reported;<br />

SD = st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation<br />

Vision<br />

outcomes<br />

• Significant<br />

reduction in<br />

astigmatic<br />

error in both<br />

the<br />

propranolol<br />

group<br />

(p=0.02) <strong>and</strong><br />

the steroid<br />

group<br />

(p=0.03) but<br />

there was no<br />

between<br />

group<br />

differences<br />

(p=0.34,<br />

n=22)<br />

• No<br />

significant<br />

group<br />

difference in<br />

the degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> ptosis<br />

(p=0.46)<br />

Propranolol Plus Pulsed Dye Laser Versus Propranolol Alone<br />

A fair quality retrospective cohort study compared three treatments for facial segmental IH:<br />

concurrent propranolol <strong>and</strong> pulsed dye laser (n=12), propranolol followed by pulsed dye laser<br />

(n=5), <strong>and</strong> propranolol alone (n=8) (Table 13). 150 Mean hemangioma size was larger in the<br />

concurrent treatment group (41.65 cm 2 ) than the sequential (20.1 cm 2 ) <strong>and</strong> propranolol-only<br />

groups (18.0 cm 2 ). Among the 12 participants who received concurrent propranolol <strong>and</strong> pulsed<br />

dye laser, six (50%) had complete clearance <strong>and</strong> six (50%) had near-complete clearance. All five<br />

<strong>of</strong> the participants in the propranolol followed by pulsed dye laser group also had complete (n=2,<br />

40%) or near-complete (n=3, 60%) clearance. Among the eight participants who receive<br />

propranolol alone, one (13%) had complete clearance, two (25%) near-complete clearance, <strong>and</strong><br />

five (63%) partial clearance. The difference in effectiveness between combined therapy, either<br />

concurrently or sequentially, <strong>and</strong> propranolol alone was statistically significant. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

days <strong>of</strong> propranolol treatment until near-complete clearance was significantly lower (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!