26.01.2016 Views

Diagnosis and Management of Infantile Hemangioma

Xxbjh

Xxbjh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 25. Key resolution outcomes in studies comparing PDL <strong>and</strong> observation<br />

Author, Year<br />

Groups (n)<br />

Quality<br />

Age, Months<br />

Type<br />

Location<br />

Methods <strong>and</strong> Measures<br />

<strong>of</strong> Resolution/<br />

Response<br />

Resolution Outcomes<br />

Kessels et al.<br />

2013 210<br />

G1: Pulsed dye<br />

laser (11)<br />

G2:<br />

Observation<br />

(11)<br />

Quality: Good<br />

Batta et al.<br />

2002 212<br />

G1: Pulsed dye<br />

laser (60)<br />

G2:<br />

Observation<br />

(61)<br />

Quality: Fair<br />

Age, median<br />

(range)<br />

G1: 3 (1.7-5.0)<br />

G2: 3 (1.5-4.5)<br />

Type<br />

Superficial <strong>and</strong><br />

cutaneous only<br />

Age, median<br />

(range, days<br />

G1: 38 (10 to<br />

101)<br />

G2: 32 (5 to<br />

79)<br />

Type, n (%)<br />

Flat<br />

G1: 31 (52)<br />

G2: 30 (49)<br />

Raised<br />

G1: 29 (48)<br />

G2: 31 (51)<br />

G1+G2:<br />

multiple<br />

G1+G2:<br />

multiple<br />

G = group; n = number; PDL = pulsed dye laser<br />

• Photographs<br />

• Color measured by<br />

reflectance<br />

photometer<br />

• Improvement scale<br />

evaluated by blinded<br />

panel<br />

1= no improvement<br />

2= moderate<br />

improvement<br />

3 = significant<br />

improvement<br />

• Photographs<br />

• Primary outcome<br />

measure assessed by<br />

investigator: complete<br />

clearance or<br />

minimum residual<br />

signs at age 1 year<br />

• Blinded medical<br />

observer assessed<br />

redness (secondary<br />

outcome measure)<br />

Change in echo depth, median<br />

(interquartile range)<br />

G1: -1.21 (-1.75 to 0.15)<br />

G2: -1.10 (-2.00 to 0.96)<br />

G1 vs.G2 p= 0.69<br />

Change in surface, median<br />

(interquartile range)<br />

G1: 0.40 (0.10 to 0.80)<br />

G2: 0.00 (-0.08 to 0.40)<br />

G1 vs.G2 p= 0.08<br />

Color change, median<br />

(interquartile range)<br />

G1: 10.16 (5.50 to 15.41)<br />

G2: 4.23 (0.84 to 5.28)<br />

G1 vs.G2 p= 0.03<br />

Complete clearance or minimum<br />

residual signs, n (%)<br />

G1: 25 (42)<br />

G2: 27 (44)<br />

G1 vs.G2: p=0.92<br />

Complete only<br />

G1: 18 (30)<br />

G2: 3 (5)<br />

G1 vs.G2: p=0.001<br />

Comparative Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Various PDL Modalities<br />

One fair quality Japanese RCT 211 r<strong>and</strong>omized 52 patients to a “traditional PDL” group <strong>and</strong> a<br />

“long-pulse” dye laser group (pulse durations <strong>of</strong> 0.45 milliseconds vs. 10-20 milliseconds). The<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> patients achieving an excellent (76-100%) clearance <strong>of</strong> the lesion did not differ<br />

between groups, with rates <strong>of</strong> 54 to 65 percent in each group. Time to maximal proliferation was<br />

significantly shorter (106 days) in the longer pulse PDL group compared with the traditional<br />

PDL group (177 days, p=0.01). Another fair quality cohort study comparing short <strong>and</strong> longer<br />

pulse PDL similarly reported no significant differences in the number <strong>of</strong> children with complete<br />

or near-complete resolution by age 3 to 3.5 years. 213<br />

In a poor quality cohort study evaluating cryogen spray cooling as an adjunct to PDL versus<br />

no cooling in 164 children (mean age overall= 2 years, 11 months), c 216 hildren in the cryogen<br />

cooling arm required fewer treatments <strong>and</strong> had greater improvements in volume <strong>and</strong> texture than<br />

children in the non-cooled PDL arm (p values

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!