26.01.2016 Views

Diagnosis and Management of Infantile Hemangioma

Xxbjh

Xxbjh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 16. Resolution outcomes in studies comparing beta-blockers (continued)<br />

Author, Year<br />

Comparison<br />

Groups (n)<br />

Quality<br />

De Graaf et al,<br />

2013 146-148<br />

G1: Atenolol,<br />

oral 1<br />

mg/kg/day up<br />

to 3 mg/kg (30)<br />

G2:<br />

Propranolol,<br />

oral<br />

2mg/kg/day<br />

(historical<br />

group) (28)<br />

Quality: Fair<br />

Age, Months<br />

Type<br />

Age, n (%)<br />

1-6 months<br />

G1: 12/24 (50)<br />

G2: 23/27 (85)<br />

6-12 months<br />

G1: 8/24 (33)<br />

G2: 4/27 (15)<br />

Over 12 months<br />

G1: 4/24 (17)<br />

G2: 0<br />

Type, n (%)<br />

Localized/<br />

nodular<br />

G1: 19/24 (79%)<br />

G2: 19/27 (70%)<br />

Segmental<br />

G1: 3/24 (13%)<br />

G2: 2/27 (8%)<br />

Indeterminate<br />

G1: 2/24 (8%)<br />

G2: 6/27 (22%)<br />

Multifocal<br />

G1: 0<br />

G2: 0<br />

Location<br />

G1+G2:<br />

multiple<br />

Methods <strong>and</strong><br />

Measures <strong>of</strong><br />

Resolution/<br />

Response<br />

• Serial<br />

photographs <strong>and</strong><br />

clinical<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

involution (color<br />

change, s<strong>of</strong>tening<br />

to palpation <strong>and</strong><br />

reduction in size)<br />

by blinded<br />

assessors<br />

• Visual analog<br />

scale (VAS) <strong>and</strong><br />

hemangioma<br />

activity score<br />

(HAS)<br />

Resolution<br />

Outcomes<br />

Clinical<br />

involution, n (%)<br />

G1: 27 (90)<br />

G2: 28 (100)<br />

VAS <strong>and</strong> HAS<br />

scores shown in<br />

figures only<br />

G1 vs. G2<br />

p= NS<br />

Rebound<br />

Growth/<br />

Recurrence,<br />

n (%)<br />

G = group; HAS = hemangioma activity score; IH = infantile hemangioma; kg = kilogram; mg = milligram; n = number; NR =<br />

not reported; NS = not significant; SD = st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation; VAS = visual analog scale<br />

Nadolol Versus Propranolol<br />

In a poor quality cohort study conducted in Canada, oral nadolol was used in the six month<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> 10 infants 1-month to 1-year <strong>of</strong> age <strong>and</strong> compared to a historical group <strong>of</strong> nine<br />

similar infants matched for age <strong>and</strong> hemangioma location who were treated with oral propranolol<br />

for at least six months (Table 17). 101 Infants were treated with oral nadolol starting at 0.5<br />

mg/kg/day divided twice daily <strong>and</strong> increased weekly by 0.5 mg/kg to a maximum dose <strong>of</strong> 4<br />

mg/kg/day (mean dose 2.19 ± 1.1 mg/kg). Propranolol was administered to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 2-3<br />

mg/kg/day divided three times daily (mean dose 1.89 ± 0.29 mg/kg). The nadolol treated group<br />

had a mean percentage IH shrinkage <strong>of</strong> 97 ± 3.05 percent at the 24-week visit compared with 86<br />

± 14.82 percent shrinkage observed in the propranolol group (p< 0.001).<br />

NR<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!