06.03.2016 Views

Thinking, Fast and Slow - Daniel Kahneman

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecause of brain damage: Damasio’s idea is known as the “somatic marker hypothesis” <strong>and</strong> it<br />

has gathered substantial support: Antonio R. Damasio, Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Human Brain (New York: Putnam, 1994). Antonio R. Damasio, “The Somatic Marker<br />

Hypothesis <strong>and</strong> the Possible Functions of the Prefrontal Cortex,” Philosophical Transactions:<br />

Biological Sciences 351 (1996): 141–20.<br />

risks of each technology: Finucane et al., “The Affect Heuristic in Judgments of Risks <strong>and</strong><br />

Benefits.” Paul Slovic, Melissa Finucane, Ellen Peters, <strong>and</strong> Donald G. MacGregor, “The<br />

Affect Heuristic,” in Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Daniel</strong> <strong>Kahneman</strong>, eds., Heuristics<br />

<strong>and</strong> Biases (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 397–420. Paul Slovic, Melissa<br />

Finucane, Ellen Peters, <strong>and</strong> Donald G. MacGregor, “Risk as Analysis <strong>and</strong> Risk as Feelings:<br />

Some Thoughts About Affect, Reason, Risk, <strong>and</strong> Rationality,” Risk Analysis 24 (2004): 1–12.<br />

Paul Slovic, “Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, <strong>and</strong> Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment<br />

Battlefield,” Risk Analysis 19 (1999): 689–701.<br />

British Toxicology Society: Slovic, “Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, <strong>and</strong> Science.” The<br />

technologies <strong>and</strong> substances used in these studies are not alternative solutions to the same<br />

problem. In realistic problems, where competitive solutions are considered, the correlation<br />

between costs <strong>and</strong> benefits must be negative; the solutions that have {ns problems,the largest<br />

benefits are also the most costly. Whether laypeople <strong>and</strong> even experts might fail to recognize<br />

the correct relationship even in those cases is an interesting question.<br />

“wags the rational dog”: Jonathan Haidt, “The Emotional Dog <strong>and</strong> Its Rational Tail: A Social<br />

Institutionist Approach to Moral Judgment,” Psychological Review 108 (2001): 814–34.<br />

“‘Risk’ does not exist”: Paul Slovic, The Perception of Risk (Sterling, VA: EarthScan, 2000).<br />

availability cascade: Timur Kuran <strong>and</strong> Cass R. Sunstein, “Availability Cascades <strong>and</strong> Risk<br />

Regulation,” Stanford Law Review 51 (1999): 683–768. CERCLA, the Comprehensive<br />

Environmental Response, Compensation, <strong>and</strong> Liability Act, passed in 1980.<br />

nothing in between: Paul Slovic, who testified for the apple growers in the Alar case, has a<br />

rather different view: “The scare was triggered by the CBS 60 Minutes broadcast that said 4,<br />

000 children will die of cancer (no probabilities there) along with frightening pictures of bald<br />

children in a cancer ward—<strong>and</strong> many more incorrect statements. Also the story exposed EPA’s<br />

lack of competence in attending to <strong>and</strong> evaluating the safety of Alar, destroying trust in<br />

regulatory control. Given this, I think the public’s response was rational.” (Personal<br />

communication, May 11, 2011.)<br />

14: Tom W’s Specialty<br />

“a shy poetry lover”: I borrowed this example from Max H. Bazerman <strong>and</strong> Don A. Moore,<br />

Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (New York: Wiley, 2008).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!