Baptism
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Is there anything wrong in getting baptized again, if you were baptized as<br />
an infant?<br />
¢¡¤£¦¥¨§©¢ £¦ ¡¦<br />
Nothing. It can be interpreted as a statement that ‘the faith of our fathers were<br />
not good enough.’ That is why the Nicene creed is interpreted today literally<br />
as "<strong>Baptism</strong> indicating the remission of sin is to be once only" as a rite of<br />
passage. But if it is required to confirm your faith and assurance of salvation<br />
there is nothing lost in rebaptism. Repeated baptism at every stage of growth<br />
as a "rite of transition" is a culturally acceptable method. After all the Jewish<br />
Priests “baptized” several times even during the day as a rite of purification.<br />
In the modern culture where families fall apart, reaffirmation of marriage<br />
contract as a full marriage ceremony is rampant. Following this reasoning, if<br />
you need to renew your covenant with God every now and then, there is<br />
nothing wrong in rebaptism. <strong>Baptism</strong> was actually ordained as a rite of<br />
initiation. Communion Table is a rite of Intensification (similar to the festivals<br />
and sacrifices of the Old Testament). There were rites of transitions which<br />
required elaborate baptisms (of immersion, washing, sprinkling, annointing<br />
etc.) which the churches uses whenever a transition occurs like the ordination<br />
of elders, deacons and pastors etc. Why do we want to use baptism? But why<br />
not? If it helps to save – praise God – let us do it.<br />
Most traditional churches that confess the Nicene Creed however will not<br />
accept you. (However the declaration "I believe in one baptism" was the result<br />
of the Roman Period when a person under persecution left the church and<br />
later wanted to come back into the church. The question then was whether<br />
they should be rebaptised or not. The decision of the Nicean council was that<br />
this is unnecessary. In that sense it is not really a prohibition of a second<br />
baptism) You may be alienated from your church. But some people really<br />
need it. They really need the personal assertion and statement through a more<br />
exhibitionistic baptism. The more ceremonial better. They cannot rely on the<br />
word, they need something visible especially if they were on the wrong path<br />
all or most of their lives. Prodigal Son needed the washing and the ring.<br />
193