Baptism
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
continued the baptism, which the Apostles were giving during the ministry of<br />
Jesus before the cross and resurrection. That is the only way we can<br />
understand the casual order of Great commission. Jesus never instituted<br />
baptism. Jesus himself followed the John’s mode of disciplining and we see a<br />
direct comparison between the two in John’s gospel. We are told that Jesus<br />
was baptizing more disciples than John. The number of disciples was the only<br />
difference. Initially the Way was restricted to Jews and therefore they already<br />
had the circumcision. When the gentiles joined the Way, the question arose<br />
whether they were to have circumcision and water baptism. Since Christianity<br />
was considered as Jewish cult, early Christians demanded the gentiles to<br />
become Jews and then receive the baptism into the way. Hence we should<br />
suppose that the baptism given was identical in nature to conversion baptism<br />
or variation in accordance with messianic perspective. It was at the council of<br />
Jerusalem the Christian community came to the realization that the church<br />
was universal and the Way was not just another Jewish cult. <strong>Baptism</strong> took a<br />
new meaning. It would be a simplification to say that baptism was always<br />
performed in exactly same way because now both the Jewish traditions,<br />
Essene traditions and the gentile traditions contributed to the forms. I should<br />
expect that different modes were used appropriate to the occasion. The Way<br />
was not ritualistic. "For freedom Christ has set you free" was the constant<br />
reminder and its corresponding inner transformations and experience replaced<br />
the outward rituals. The flesh was of no avail. I should expect that baptism<br />
was performed, standing, squatting, immersing, pouring, sprinkling or even<br />
without water with hand. The mode was secondary. However it is unlikely<br />
that immersing backward was ever employed in any baptism – Christian,<br />
Jewish or Gentile. – until the 1500s. Making disciples was the purpose.<br />
Whether they were washed then or later did not really matter.<br />
¢¡¤£¦¥¨§©¢ £¦ ¡¦<br />
But as the Church became the official religion of Rome and institutionalized,<br />
the leaders became powerful, rituals returned and insistence of form without<br />
content began to return. <strong>Baptism</strong> became the fashion of the period. The few<br />
who opposed were forced into it because that was the religion of the Empire.<br />
<strong>Baptism</strong> by total immersion became popular during this period. Historical<br />
205