06.04.2016 Views

Baptism

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

continued the baptism, which the Apostles were giving during the ministry of<br />

Jesus before the cross and resurrection. That is the only way we can<br />

understand the casual order of Great commission. Jesus never instituted<br />

baptism. Jesus himself followed the John’s mode of disciplining and we see a<br />

direct comparison between the two in John’s gospel. We are told that Jesus<br />

was baptizing more disciples than John. The number of disciples was the only<br />

difference. Initially the Way was restricted to Jews and therefore they already<br />

had the circumcision. When the gentiles joined the Way, the question arose<br />

whether they were to have circumcision and water baptism. Since Christianity<br />

was considered as Jewish cult, early Christians demanded the gentiles to<br />

become Jews and then receive the baptism into the way. Hence we should<br />

suppose that the baptism given was identical in nature to conversion baptism<br />

or variation in accordance with messianic perspective. It was at the council of<br />

Jerusalem the Christian community came to the realization that the church<br />

was universal and the Way was not just another Jewish cult. <strong>Baptism</strong> took a<br />

new meaning. It would be a simplification to say that baptism was always<br />

performed in exactly same way because now both the Jewish traditions,<br />

Essene traditions and the gentile traditions contributed to the forms. I should<br />

expect that different modes were used appropriate to the occasion. The Way<br />

was not ritualistic. "For freedom Christ has set you free" was the constant<br />

reminder and its corresponding inner transformations and experience replaced<br />

the outward rituals. The flesh was of no avail. I should expect that baptism<br />

was performed, standing, squatting, immersing, pouring, sprinkling or even<br />

without water with hand. The mode was secondary. However it is unlikely<br />

that immersing backward was ever employed in any baptism – Christian,<br />

Jewish or Gentile. – until the 1500s. Making disciples was the purpose.<br />

Whether they were washed then or later did not really matter.<br />

¢¡¤£¦¥¨§©¢ £¦ ¡¦<br />

But as the Church became the official religion of Rome and institutionalized,<br />

the leaders became powerful, rituals returned and insistence of form without<br />

content began to return. <strong>Baptism</strong> became the fashion of the period. The few<br />

who opposed were forced into it because that was the religion of the Empire.<br />

<strong>Baptism</strong> by total immersion became popular during this period. Historical<br />

205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!