Beyond clickbait and commerce
v13n2-3
v13n2-3
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Denis Muller<br />
least some of the characteristics of news. These characteristics are<br />
defined in news values. Material published as news that contains<br />
little or nothing by way of news values may rightly give rise to a<br />
question about the propriety of the motive for publishing it as news.<br />
Lippmann further enlightens us with his insight that before<br />
something takes on the nature of news, it must enter a factual<br />
realm that takes it beyond mere rumour or speculation <strong>and</strong> in<br />
so doing manifests itself in a definable form – a fire, a riot, the<br />
introduction of a legislative Bill. He writes of news as thus assuming<br />
a definable shape. It then becomes a question of who does the<br />
shaping. In Lippmann’s now seemingly far-off world, the shaper is<br />
the ‘press agent’:<br />
Were reporting the simple recovery of obvious facts, the press<br />
agent would be little more than a clerk. But since, in respect to<br />
most of the big topics of news, the facts are not simple <strong>and</strong> not<br />
at all obvious, but subject to choice <strong>and</strong> opinion, it is natural<br />
that everyone would wish to make his own choice of facts<br />
for the newspaper to print. The publicity man does that. … It<br />
follows that the picture which the publicity man makes for the<br />
reporter is the one he wishes the public to see. He is censor <strong>and</strong><br />
propag<strong>and</strong>ist …<br />
Note, however, that in this model, which obtained for many<br />
decades, the publicity agent <strong>and</strong> the reporter are two different<br />
people <strong>and</strong> are assumed to have different responsibilities <strong>and</strong><br />
interests: the publicity agent to his or her client in acting as censor<br />
or propag<strong>and</strong>ist, the reporter to the public in providing the best<br />
available version of contemporary truth. In the world where<br />
news-like content is created, these two personas, with their often<br />
conflicting responsibilities <strong>and</strong> interests, merge into one.<br />
Bull (2013: 74-83) has argued that ‘br<strong>and</strong> journalism’ is not<br />
necessarily unethical because it is open to br<strong>and</strong> journalists to<br />
adhere to the profession’s codes of ethics, but there is an inherent<br />
contradiction here. Typically, the codes require independence,<br />
impartiality <strong>and</strong> transparency, qualities that are by definition absent<br />
from br<strong>and</strong> journalism.<br />
It may also be argued that in these new circumstances, the conflict<br />
of interest disappears because the interests <strong>and</strong> responsibilities are<br />
congruent <strong>and</strong> inhere in the one journalistic practitioner. This is<br />
a fallacy. It ignores the deception involved in making one thing,<br />
advertising or promotion, appear like another, news.<br />
The nature of journalism<br />
Journalism as a professional practice exhibits certain characteristics<br />
that enable the profession to keep the implied promises it makes<br />
98 Copyright 2016-2/3. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 13, No 2/3 2016