24.05.2016 Views

Beyond clickbait and commerce

v13n2-3

v13n2-3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Denis Muller<br />

least some of the characteristics of news. These characteristics are<br />

defined in news values. Material published as news that contains<br />

little or nothing by way of news values may rightly give rise to a<br />

question about the propriety of the motive for publishing it as news.<br />

Lippmann further enlightens us with his insight that before<br />

something takes on the nature of news, it must enter a factual<br />

realm that takes it beyond mere rumour or speculation <strong>and</strong> in<br />

so doing manifests itself in a definable form – a fire, a riot, the<br />

introduction of a legislative Bill. He writes of news as thus assuming<br />

a definable shape. It then becomes a question of who does the<br />

shaping. In Lippmann’s now seemingly far-off world, the shaper is<br />

the ‘press agent’:<br />

Were reporting the simple recovery of obvious facts, the press<br />

agent would be little more than a clerk. But since, in respect to<br />

most of the big topics of news, the facts are not simple <strong>and</strong> not<br />

at all obvious, but subject to choice <strong>and</strong> opinion, it is natural<br />

that everyone would wish to make his own choice of facts<br />

for the newspaper to print. The publicity man does that. … It<br />

follows that the picture which the publicity man makes for the<br />

reporter is the one he wishes the public to see. He is censor <strong>and</strong><br />

propag<strong>and</strong>ist …<br />

Note, however, that in this model, which obtained for many<br />

decades, the publicity agent <strong>and</strong> the reporter are two different<br />

people <strong>and</strong> are assumed to have different responsibilities <strong>and</strong><br />

interests: the publicity agent to his or her client in acting as censor<br />

or propag<strong>and</strong>ist, the reporter to the public in providing the best<br />

available version of contemporary truth. In the world where<br />

news-like content is created, these two personas, with their often<br />

conflicting responsibilities <strong>and</strong> interests, merge into one.<br />

Bull (2013: 74-83) has argued that ‘br<strong>and</strong> journalism’ is not<br />

necessarily unethical because it is open to br<strong>and</strong> journalists to<br />

adhere to the profession’s codes of ethics, but there is an inherent<br />

contradiction here. Typically, the codes require independence,<br />

impartiality <strong>and</strong> transparency, qualities that are by definition absent<br />

from br<strong>and</strong> journalism.<br />

It may also be argued that in these new circumstances, the conflict<br />

of interest disappears because the interests <strong>and</strong> responsibilities are<br />

congruent <strong>and</strong> inhere in the one journalistic practitioner. This is<br />

a fallacy. It ignores the deception involved in making one thing,<br />

advertising or promotion, appear like another, news.<br />

The nature of journalism<br />

Journalism as a professional practice exhibits certain characteristics<br />

that enable the profession to keep the implied promises it makes<br />

98 Copyright 2016-2/3. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 13, No 2/3 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!