Beyond clickbait and commerce

Recommendations

Info

charitable journalism may be recognised by its regulation against clear ethical standards. And this, in turn, should lead to more scope for news organisations to be granted charitable status. Note 1 The author was founding director of the IMPRESS Project and is Chief Executive Officer of IMPRESS References Council of Europe (2011) Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on a new notion of media. Available online at https://wcd.coe.int/ ViewDoc.jsp?id=1835645, accessed on 8 January 2016 Heawood, Jonathan et al. (2012) Good news? A report by the advisory group on journalism and charitable status. Available online at http://www.mediaplurality. com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Leveson-submission-Good-News.pdf, accessed on 4 January 2016 Hermes, Jeffrey P. (2012) Guide to the Internal Revenue Service decision-making process under 501(c)(3) for journalism and publishing non-profit organizations, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Berkman Center for Internet and Society House of Lords (2012) House of Lords Communications Committee: The future of investigative journalism. Available online at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ ld201012/ldselect/ldcomuni/256/25602.htm, accessed on 8 January 2016 IPSO (2016) Editors’ code of practice. Available online at http://www.editorscode. org.uk/the_code.php, accessed on 8 January 2016 Leveson, Lord Justice (2012) An inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press, London, Stationery Office. Available online at http://webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/ document/hc1213/hc07/0780/0780.asp, accessed on 8 January 2016 Levy, David and Picard, Robert (eds) (2011) Is there a better structure for news providers? The potential in charitable and trust ownership, Oxford, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, available online at http://reutersinstitute. politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Charitable%20Ownerships%20and%20 Trusts%20in%20News%20Organisations.pdf, accessed on 8 January 2016 Maclennan, Alison (2007) Blackstone’s guide to the Charities Act 2006, Oxford, Oxford University Press Moore, Martin (2014) Addressing the democratic deficit in local news through positive plurality, London, Media Standards Trust. Available online at http:// mediastandardstrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Positive-Plurality-policypaper-9-10-14.pdf, accessed on 8 January 2016 National Union of Journalists (2011) Code of conduct. Available online at https:// www.nuj.org.uk/about/nuj-code/, accessed on 8 January 2016 Radcliffe, Damian (2015) Where are we now? UK hyperlocal media and community journalism in 2015. Available online at https://www.communityjournalism.co.uk/ wp-content/uploads/2015/09/C4CJ-Report-for-Screen.pdf, accessed on 8 January 2016 Smith, Julian et al. (2011) Written evidence to House of Lords Select Committee on Communications inquiry into the future of investigative journalism. Available online at http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/communications/ Investigativejournalism/IJev.pdf, accessed on 4 January 2016 Townend, J. (2016) The United Kingdom: The impact of charity and tax law/ regulation on not-for-profit news organizations, Picard, R.G., Belair-Gagnon, V. and Ranchordás, S. (eds) The impact of charity and tax law/regulation on not-for-profit news organizations, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford; Information Society Project, Yale Law School DISCUSSION PAPER Copyright 2016-2/3. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 13, No 2/3 2016 93
Jonathan Heawood Vernor-Miles, Flackett and Rees-Pulley v Charity Commission for England & Wales (2015) CA/2014/0022. Available online at http://www.charity.tribunals.gov.uk/ documents/decisions/Vernor-Miles-decision-15-Jun-15.pdf, accessed on 4 January 2016 Westminster, University of (2014) Discussion seminar: Charitable initiatives for journalism and media – summary. Available online at www.mediaplurality.com/ wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Charity-seminar-summary-June-2014_updated.pdf, accessed on 8 January 2016 Note on the contributor Jonathan Heawood is Chief Executive Officer of IMPRESS and a Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Writing and Rights, University of East Anglia. He co-chaired the Advisory Group on Journalism and Charitable Status and gave evidence to the Leveson Inquiry in his capacity as Director of English PEN. Recent publications include Censorship, The encyclopedia of twentieth-century fiction, Oxford, Blackwell, 2011; Taking offence: Free speech, blasphemy and the media, Mitchell, Jolyon and Gower, Owen (eds) Religion and the news, Farnham, Ashgate, 2012; Writerly rights: Free speech, privacy and H. G. Wells, Critical Quarterly, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2014; and Independent and effective? The post-Leveson framework for press regulation, Journal of Media Law, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2015. 94 Copyright 2016-2/3. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 13, No 2/3 2016
Page 1 and 2:
Beyond clickbait and commerce The e
Page 4 and 5:
Contents Editorial Looking beyond t
Page 6 and 7:
EDITORIAL Looking beyond the tradit
Page 8 and 9:
These questions of independence are
Page 10 and 11:
of the work produced by foundation-
Page 12 and 13:
Crisis Center, for example, has a g
Page 14 and 15:
library that spotlights progress in
Page 16 and 17:
journalists working on the developm
Page 18 and 19:
Note on the contributor Dr Mel Bunc
Page 20 and 21:
2014). One response has been to par
Page 22 and 23:
and/or distributed by ENGOs to mobi
Page 24 and 25:
democratic dissent’, while DeLuca
Page 26 and 27:
ecording the interviews, I engaged
Page 28 and 29:
spent two weeks collecting images a
Page 30 and 31:
Although photographs of spirit bear
Page 32 and 33:
up the article ‘Pipeline through
Page 34 and 35:
Alexandra Garcia, iLCP communicatio
Page 36 and 37:
killed/, accessed on 27 December 20
Page 38 and 39:
Dave Harte ‘Tell it like it is’
Page 40 and 41:
Veronica Coatham and Lisa Martinali
Page 42 and 43:
which content its audience is most
Page 44 and 45:
in the 1990s and early 2000s. Borge
Page 46 and 47: in Leeds, he notes the valuable rol
Page 48 and 49: Yet the nature of the journalism at
Page 50 and 51: Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/Knowl
Page 52 and 53: Unitec research colleagues; media p
Page 54 and 55: voice in seven unique contexts was
Page 56 and 57: therefore, challenging to strike th
Page 58 and 59: 7 The Pacifica Mamas, ‘matriarchs
Page 60 and 61: sharing approach to collaboration,
Page 62 and 63: programme, and they wanted the spot
Page 64 and 65: and that I was entrusting myself to
Page 66 and 67: ecosystem (Cooren 2015b). In a 2015
Page 68 and 69: Saifoloi, Malama, Stowers-Ama, Jarc
Page 70 and 71: informed citizenry. Most see journa
Page 72 and 73: While there is no universally accep
Page 74 and 75: news organisation are decisions to
Page 76 and 77: is largely seen as unethical to ask
Page 78 and 79: open to paying for content. Others
Page 80 and 81: Conclusions Overall, oppositional n
Page 82 and 83: Foster, Michelle (2012) Calling the
Page 84 and 85: Judith Townend ‘Charitable journa
Page 86 and 87: In the second category, where the r
Page 88 and 89: Among the issues is the Charity Com
Page 90 and 91: House of Lords (2012) House of Lord
Page 92 and 93: press in a democracy to campaign, l
Page 94 and 95: The tribunal’s decision For the p
Page 98 and 99: Denis Muller Conflict of interest:
Page 100 and 101: Tanner et al. (2005: 187) identify
Page 102 and 103: to its audiences. To engage in jour
Page 104 and 105: creating a commercial climate in wh
Page 106 and 107: that a sponsor would have no role i
Page 108 and 109: Items about Dove not labelled as sp
Page 110 and 111: their public-interest responsibilit
Page 112 and 113: Murtha, Jack and Gourarie, Chava (2
Page 114 and 115: Recognising the shadow elements of
Page 116 and 117: admits that ‘systematic’ may be
Page 118 and 119: Rather than ethics being an issue t
show all

Beyond clickbait and commerce

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?