24.05.2016 Views

Beyond clickbait and commerce

v13n2-3

v13n2-3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lyn McGaurr<br />

They were a pain in the neck to work with because they wanted<br />

assurances that they were going to see a spirit bear <strong>and</strong> I lied<br />

<strong>and</strong> I said: Of course you’re going to see it – it’s very easy to<br />

see. And they came <strong>and</strong> miraculously they saw the bear. And<br />

they played it on international news in the United States. But we<br />

also brought a movie team – a filmmaker team – Trip Jennings.<br />

… So the filmmakers came <strong>and</strong> we raised the money for them<br />

to produce Spoil. And so Spoil became the documentary that<br />

was attached to the RAVE. And so it was not just the National<br />

Geographic magazine. We had a press conference <strong>and</strong> we had<br />

about 10 conservation partners in the US <strong>and</strong> Canada. We<br />

wanted to blow the story as far <strong>and</strong> wide as we could. And we<br />

did (Mittermeier, Cristina, personal communication, 8 July 2015).<br />

Mittermeier’s faith in the mainstream media appeal of the spirit<br />

bear was borne out by the six-minute Nightline video story, in which<br />

journalist David Wright interviewed Mittermeier, McAllister <strong>and</strong><br />

Nicklen but also conducted his own quest for the animal, stressing<br />

the isolation of the area by pointing out that there were no roads or<br />

l<strong>and</strong>ing strips. In so doing, Wright’s encounter with the spirit bear<br />

pre-empted Nicklen’s own success in photographing the animal,<br />

suggesting a degree of competition may have contributed to ABC’s<br />

decision to cover the RAVE. Importantly, ABC also gave Mittermeier<br />

space to expound her thesis that conservation photography<br />

makes a valid <strong>and</strong> important contribution to the public sphere:<br />

‘Photography doesn’t require translation. It actually has a power to<br />

captivate audiences. And we can convene important conversations<br />

around these images’ (Mittermeier cited in Wright n.d.).<br />

Of the 86 photographs from the RAVE that appear in a slideshow<br />

on the iLCP’s website, only seven feature the spirit bear (iLCPb),<br />

<strong>and</strong> these are by McAllister <strong>and</strong> Wendy Shattil. Mittermeier’s<br />

photographs of First Nations’ people <strong>and</strong> their intimate connection<br />

with the threatened waterways <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>, share the screen(s)<br />

with her RAVE collaborators’ photographs of other terrestrial <strong>and</strong><br />

marine life, protests against the pipeline, l<strong>and</strong>scapes <strong>and</strong> aerial<br />

views, as well as a shot of wolves by Robinson. In the context of the<br />

hypermediacy of the iLCP website, with its brief textual explanations<br />

of the problem <strong>and</strong> solution, this combination of images builds<br />

an environmental narrative that is complex, comprehensible<br />

<strong>and</strong> emotionally engaging. When a varied selection of the RAVE<br />

photographs was reproduced on the Guardian’s website in<br />

November 2010 in a long scroll accompanied by detailed captions<br />

<strong>and</strong> links to the iLCP <strong>and</strong> Pacific Wild websites, the narrative of the<br />

RAVE rather than the search for the spirit bear was the successful<br />

hook that made space for the crucial story of the rainforest, the<br />

First Nations <strong>and</strong> the Enbridge threat. In fact, no images of spirit<br />

bears appeared in the Guardian feature.<br />

26 Copyright 2016-2/3. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 13, No 2/3 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!