24.05.2016 Views

Beyond clickbait and commerce

v13n2-3

v13n2-3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recognising the shadow elements of PR – persuasion <strong>and</strong> its<br />

even darker cousin propag<strong>and</strong>a – brings the issue of power to<br />

the foreground in Fawkes’ analysis, including economic, social,<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural power, although interestingly she does not mention<br />

political power.<br />

Despite her strong criticisms of dominant theories of PR <strong>and</strong><br />

shameful practices that are enacted (Stauber <strong>and</strong> Rampton 1995),<br />

Fawkes does not dismiss PR per se or stop at deconstruction. She<br />

uses Jung’s depth psychology to point out that, in the case of<br />

individuals, the ‘self’ is composed of multiple elements that often<br />

act in conflict or tension with each other, describing this as a ‘messy<br />

psyche’ (p. 141). So it is with organisations, Fawkes suggests.<br />

The point is to recognise the dark side, the power imbalances,<br />

the potentialities for harm as well as good, <strong>and</strong> deal with them<br />

rather than veneer them over with idealistic theories, self-serving<br />

managerial <strong>and</strong> functionalist models of practice, <strong>and</strong> aspirational<br />

<strong>and</strong> unenforceable codes of ethics. Fawkes also constructively<br />

calls for an end to the ‘slanging match’ that often occurs between<br />

critical scholars <strong>and</strong> proponents of the dominant paradigm, <strong>and</strong><br />

sees hope in newly emerging sociocultural thinking about PR that<br />

seeks to integrate the interests of organisations <strong>and</strong> society.<br />

Fawkes also draws on a substantial body of literature beyond Jung,<br />

including the social theories of Durkheim <strong>and</strong> Weber, Habermas’s<br />

public sphere <strong>and</strong> its corrupting influences (Habermas 1989), <strong>and</strong><br />

Bourdieu’s habitus (Bourdieu 1984), as well as complexity theory,<br />

chaos theory, postmodernism <strong>and</strong> concepts such as reflexivity. In<br />

contrast with triumphalist texts on PR, Fawkes refreshingly practises<br />

reflexivity, citing her own experiences as a PR practitioner before<br />

becoming an academic, <strong>and</strong> ‘owning up’ to her own doubts <strong>and</strong><br />

uncertainties. She argues that ‘uncertainty is a healthy state to be<br />

in when reflecting on ethical situations’, rejecting the hubris of<br />

certainty <strong>and</strong> ‘idealised self-images’ (p. 1; p. 5).<br />

While this book is based on ‘conceptual research’ <strong>and</strong> a ‘hermeneutic<br />

approach’ (p. 5) involving critical interpretation rather than new<br />

empirical data, it presents new ideas for twenty-first century public<br />

relations.<br />

Given the increasing role of PR as ‘a social force … a producer of<br />

culture’ in contemporary societies (p. 226), the arguments presented<br />

in this book warrant close attention by scholars, professional bodies<br />

in the PR industry, <strong>and</strong> practitioners.<br />

References<br />

Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of<br />

taste, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press<br />

Copyright 2016-2/3. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 13, No 2/3 2016 111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!