29.06.2016 Views

https://goo.gl/sZ7V7x

293g79C

293g79C

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Number of programm<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

1950<br />

20 80<br />

70<br />

70<br />

60<br />

0<br />

asset and input transfers (in-kind transfers with a productive role, such as seeds, fertilisers, livestock);<br />

50<br />

and subsidies 40 (such as fuel, agricultural and food subsidies).<br />

30<br />

23<br />

19 19 17<br />

FIGURE 220<br />

– Types of interventions<br />

10<br />

8<br />

4 4 3 3 1 1<br />

0<br />

1950<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

70<br />

Unconditional<br />

cash transfer<br />

Unconditional<br />

cash transfer<br />

1955<br />

1955<br />

Cash for work<br />

23<br />

Cash for work<br />

1960<br />

1960<br />

Conditional<br />

cash transfer<br />

1965<br />

Conditional<br />

cash transfer<br />

1965<br />

1970<br />

1970<br />

Social support<br />

services<br />

1975<br />

19 19 17<br />

Social support<br />

services<br />

1975<br />

Conditional<br />

in-kind transfer<br />

1980<br />

1980<br />

Training<br />

8<br />

Conditional<br />

in-kind transfer<br />

Training<br />

1985<br />

1985<br />

Subsidies<br />

Subsidies<br />

1990<br />

1990<br />

Assets and<br />

inputs transfers<br />

4 4<br />

Assets and<br />

inputs transfers<br />

1995<br />

1995<br />

Unconditional<br />

in-kind transfer<br />

Unconditional<br />

in-kind transfer<br />

2000<br />

2000<br />

Educational<br />

fee waivers<br />

2005<br />

2010<br />

3 3 1 1<br />

Educational<br />

fee waivers<br />

2005<br />

Microfinance<br />

Microfinance<br />

2010<br />

Food for work<br />

Food for work<br />

2015<br />

2015<br />

Source: Authors’ elaboration based on mapped programmes.<br />

To reach the target groups, around 40 per cent of the mapped programmes rely on a sin<strong>gl</strong>e targeting method,<br />

which in 63 per cent of these cases is categorical targeting. Conversely, in most cases the target population<br />

is selected by combining different mechanisms. The most commonly used targeting methods are categorical<br />

targeting, geographical targeting and community-based targeting (see Figure 3).<br />

FIGURE 3 – Targeting methods<br />

Number of programmes<br />

Number of programmes<br />

10<br />

80<br />

0<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

Source: Authors’ 30 elaboration based on mapped programmes.<br />

20<br />

Around 40 10 per cent of the social protection programmes mapped address more than one demographic group at<br />

the same time 0 (e.g. children, elderly people, women). Moreover, the targeted demographic categories may overlap:<br />

for instance, a programme may target children with disabilities or young women. Therefore, in our analysis we<br />

focus on the different characteristics taken into account during the targeting phase. The most targeted individuals<br />

or households are those with children, elderly people and people with disabilities. However, in several cases,<br />

programmes are targeted at ‘poor households’, defined only according to socio-economic criteria without specifically<br />

60<br />

addressing demographic characteristics within the eligibility criteria (see Figure 4). In several cases, target groups are<br />

50<br />

identified using proxies for social and economic conditions. For instance, only in a few cases, programmes addressing<br />

40<br />

food insecurity select households relying specifically on food insecurity indicators, but often the household’s<br />

30<br />

dependency ratio or its demographic composition are used as a proxy for food insecurity.<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Categorical<br />

targeting<br />

Geographical<br />

targeting<br />

0<br />

60<br />

10 | Social Protection in Africa: inventory of non-contributory programmes<br />

50<br />

40<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

Children<br />

Categorical<br />

targeting<br />

Elderly people<br />

People with<br />

disabilities<br />

Geographical<br />

targeting<br />

oor households<br />

omen and girls<br />

Community<br />

-based<br />

targeting<br />

Community<br />

-based<br />

targeting<br />

our-constrained<br />

households<br />

Working-age<br />

individuals<br />

Proxy<br />

means test<br />

Proxy<br />

means test<br />

Food-insecure<br />

households<br />

Unemployed<br />

Self-targeting<br />

Self-targeting<br />

Smallholder<br />

farmers<br />

Young people<br />

War veterans<br />

Means test<br />

Means test<br />

Chronically ill<br />

individuals

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!