29.06.2016 Views

https://goo.gl/sZ7V7x

293g79C

293g79C

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TANZANIA<br />

Community-Based Conditional Cash Transfer<br />

Programme<br />

Community-Based Conditional Cash Transfer<br />

Country<br />

Tanzania<br />

Geographic area<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

Previous programme name (if any)<br />

Start date 2009 1<br />

Programme objectives<br />

To test how a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme could employ<br />

a community-driven development (CDD) approach, and investigate which<br />

systems achieve better results for highly vulnerable populations. 2<br />

Programme type<br />

Conditional cash transfer<br />

Programme components This programme is part of the larger Tanzania Social Action Fund (TASAF). 1<br />

Conditionalities (if any)<br />

To ensure that children are properly educated and that children and<br />

elderly people are healthy: children aged 0–5 had to visit a health clinic<br />

six times per year and those aged 7–15 needed to be enrolled in school<br />

with attendance rates of at least 80 per cent; elderly people had to visit a<br />

health clinic once per year. 2,3<br />

Targeting methods Categorical and community-based targeting. 3<br />

Target areas<br />

TASAF covers villages in the districts of Bagamoyo, Chamwino and<br />

Kibaha, which were the poorest and most vulnerable districts, selected<br />

by ranking the following indicators: poverty level, food insecurity, primary<br />

school gross enrolment ratio, access to safe water, access to health<br />

facilities, AIDS case rates and road accessibility. 1<br />

Target groups<br />

Children and the vulnerable elderly people.<br />

Eligibility criteria<br />

Eligible households had an orphan and/or vulnerable child or an<br />

elderly person (60 years or older). The selection criteria were based on<br />

household characteristics of very poor people, as determined by the local<br />

communities. Vulnerable children were those who were abandoned, or<br />

were chronically sick, or were orphans (one or both parents deceased),<br />

or who had one or two chronically sick parents. Vulnerable elderly people<br />

were those with no caregivers, or who were sick or very poor. Priority<br />

was given to the following categories: first to child-headed households;<br />

second to households headed by an elderly person; and third to<br />

households composed solely of elderly persons. 1,2<br />

Eligibility reassessment (if any)<br />

Type of benefits<br />

Cash<br />

Amount of benefits<br />

The amount of benefits varied according to the number of elderly<br />

people and vulnerable children in each household, from a minimum<br />

transfer of USD12 to a maximum transfer of USD36. A transfer of<br />

USD6 was granted for each child and USD12 for each elderly person,<br />

leading to an average payment of USD14.50 per household. 1,3<br />

Payment/delivery frequency<br />

Bi-monthly<br />

Benefit delivery mechanism<br />

Community management committees were responsible<br />

for making payments to the beneficiary households. 2<br />

Benefit recipients<br />

Usually the mother of the children in the<br />

household—if present—was the recipient. 2<br />

Minimum and maximum<br />

duration of benefits (if any)<br />

Coverage 5,000 households or 13,000 beneficiaries (2013) 1<br />

Programme expenditure By 2011, TZS900,872,500 had been disbursed for this pilot. 4<br />

140 | Social Protection in Africa: inventory of non-contributory programmes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!