SIGAR
2017-01-30qr
2017-01-30qr
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDICES<br />
TABLE A.2 (CONTINUED)<br />
CROSS-REFERENCE TO SEMIANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER<br />
SECTION 5 OF THE IG ACT OF 1978, AS AMENDED (5 U.S.C. APP. 3) (“IG ACT”)<br />
IG Act Section IG Act Language <strong>SIGAR</strong> Action Section<br />
Section 5(a)(11)<br />
A description and explanation of the reasons for<br />
any significant revised management decision<br />
Extract pertinent information from SWA/JPG<br />
member reports<br />
See reports of SWA/JPG<br />
members<br />
Explain <strong>SIGAR</strong> audit reports in which significant<br />
revisions have been made to management<br />
decisions<br />
Extract pertinent information from SWA/JPG<br />
member reports<br />
None<br />
Section 5(a)(12)<br />
Section 5(a)(13)<br />
Section 5(a)(14)(A)<br />
Section 5(a)(14)(B)<br />
Section 5(a)(15)<br />
Section 5(a)(16)<br />
Information concerning any significant management<br />
decision with which the Inspector General is<br />
in disagreement<br />
Information described under [Section 804(b)] of<br />
the Federal Financial Management Improvement<br />
Act of 1996 (instances and reasons when an<br />
agency has not met target dates established in a<br />
remediation plan)<br />
An Appendix containing the results of any peer<br />
review conducted by another Office of Inspector<br />
General during the reporting period; or<br />
If no peer review was conducted within that reporting<br />
period, a statement identifying the date of the<br />
last peer review conducted by another Office of<br />
Inspector General<br />
A list of any outstanding recommendations from<br />
any peer review conducted by another Office of<br />
Inspector General that have not been fully implement,<br />
including a statement describing the status<br />
of the implementation and why implementation is<br />
not complete<br />
Any peer reviews conducted by <strong>SIGAR</strong> of another<br />
IG Office during the reporting period, including a<br />
list of any outstanding recommendations made<br />
from any previous peer review . . . that remain<br />
outstanding or have not been fully implemented<br />
Explain <strong>SIGAR</strong> audit reports in which <strong>SIGAR</strong><br />
disagreed with management decision<br />
Extract pertinent information from SWA/JPG<br />
member reports<br />
Provide information where management has not<br />
met targets from a remediation plan<br />
<strong>SIGAR</strong> has posted in full the results of, and<br />
reports from, <strong>SIGAR</strong>’s most recent peer reviews<br />
(completed during July 2010, prior to the current<br />
reporting period), on its website<br />
A peer review was conducted in the<br />
reporting period<br />
None – all peer review recommendations<br />
effectively addressed, and remedial measures<br />
implemented, by 9/30/2015<br />
Not applicable (<strong>SIGAR</strong> did not conduct, or<br />
participate in the conduct, of a peer review of<br />
another Office of Inspector General during the<br />
reporting period)<br />
See reports of SWA/JPG<br />
members<br />
No disputed decisions<br />
during the reporting period<br />
See reports of SWA/JPG<br />
members<br />
No disputed<br />
decisions during the reporting<br />
period<br />
Posted in full at<br />
www.sigar.mil<br />
Posted in full at<br />
www.sigar.mil<br />
Recommendations and<br />
related materials posted in<br />
full at www.sigar.mil<br />
<strong>SIGAR</strong> Oversight<br />
REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS I JANUARY 30, 2017<br />
221
Change language