Publication (142 pages).
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
126<br />
medicalization of the act of drinking alcohol, known as ‘alcoholism’.<br />
This term was intended to highlight alcohol’s addictive<br />
nature and the detrimental effects it can cause. Alcoholism later<br />
found its way into the DSM-IV, solidifying its description<br />
as a disease (Valverde 1998); however current editions of the<br />
DSM do not list alcoholism, indicating the constantly shifting<br />
positions on the behaviour. Today support groups exist such<br />
as “Alcoholics Anonymous” for those whose drinking may appear<br />
to interfere with their life. There do currently existcertain<br />
laws; although prohibition is long gone, legislation dictates<br />
drinking age and distribution, and has written consequences<br />
for those driving under the influence or caught selling to<br />
a minor. Moral claimants may have advocated these types of<br />
regulations, but they have manifested into a state regulation.<br />
An interesting perspective on alcoholism is its designation as a<br />
‘disease of the will’. Mariana Valverde’s analysis draws attention<br />
to the way that society’s attention to alcohol is really an extension<br />
of an obsession with ‘free will’ (Valverde 1998). Individual<br />
freedom has been a facet of every debate on alcohol and is<br />
often tied up in the counter-claims that individuals provide.<br />
Questions of addictions tend to be tied up in personal freedom<br />
and self-control with moral regulation determining the boundaries<br />
on those acts. By drawing attention to ideas of freedom,<br />
Valverde demonstrates the way in which socially determined<br />
problems interfere with individual will. The complexity of<br />
alcohol consumption serves as an example of social problem<br />
construction in much of the literature. It highlights the ways<br />
in which socially determined problems are constantly shifting<br />
between claims and claimants, and are always being reinvented.<br />
The complexity of alcohol as a social problem mirrors that of<br />
hoarding behaviour: both have been medicalized at some point,<br />
have moral advocates, are regulated in some ways by law, and<br />
deal with free will. The history of alcohol as a social problem<br />
gives insight into the ways hoarding may change according to<br />
the claims and claimants that are current in the social problems<br />
sphere.Hoarding is a behaviour that describes the accumulation<br />
and inability to discard material goods; however its presence in<br />
society is multi-faceted and complex. Hoarding has been constructed<br />
into a social problem by medical and moral advocates<br />
who claim that the objective behaviours of hoarding are harmful.<br />
Both of these constructions place blame on the individuals<br />
who perpetrate the behaviour and recommend intervention by<br />
medical therapists, professional organizers, and waste profes-