Publication (142 pages).
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Karl Marx opens Capital Volume One [1867] with a description<br />
of the commodity as “an object outside us, a thing that by<br />
its properties satisfies human wants of some sort or another”.<br />
The commodity and commodity exchange became the focus of<br />
Marx’s work, providing a theory of the growing economic system<br />
and its complications and contradictions. The shift from<br />
early to late industrialization raised production levels and increased<br />
commodity exchange, creating a new level of affluence<br />
in everyday life. People were inclined to buy commodities that<br />
went beyond basic subsistence due to new levels of wealth. Although<br />
Marx identifies commodities by use and exchange-values<br />
that include standard labour amounts and working time,<br />
the commodity today is known for its allure and potential satisfaction<br />
stemming from human need or want. Modern consumer<br />
culture is thus characterized by the existence of commodities<br />
in everyday life.<br />
The commodity<br />
As commodities developed and profits increased, the onset of<br />
higher levels of wealth and consumption led to the development<br />
of luxury goods. Purchased with excess wealth, luxury<br />
items immediately became items of status that indicated<br />
class position, authority, and respectability.<br />
Thorstein Veblen wrote about conspicuous consumption<br />
and wealth emulation at the turn of the<br />
century. He believed the luxury commodity contributed<br />
to rising levels of material accumulation<br />
due to its use as a tool of status display. Veblen<br />
used the term ‘pecuniary emulation’ to describe<br />
the process of continually buying objects that were<br />
newer or more expensive that what your peers or<br />
neighbours had; this was in attempt to solidify or<br />
improve status (Veblen 2003:17). The commodity<br />
today is still known for its link with ideas of status<br />
Status<br />
and wealth; initially introduced<br />
as a sign of upper class<br />
status, the multiple classes<br />
of modernity still use commodities<br />
as signals of their<br />
membership in a group, or<br />
to try to initiate membership<br />
in a different group. Indeed,<br />
pecuniary emulation<br />
was only the beginning of a<br />
longstanding association of<br />
objects and status.<br />
23