18.06.2017 Views

Publication (142 pages).

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tend to be consumed<br />

bjects, which become<br />

iation and, rapidly, the<br />

, the alibi, of the relathat<br />

what is consumed<br />

the relation itself...it is<br />

tion that is consumed<br />

jects which manifests<br />

er a lived relation: it is<br />

ulled in an object-sign<br />

s consumed.”<br />

postmodern consumer society goes beyond objects<br />

as signs however; this is the period when<br />

the procurement of goods begins to affect human<br />

interaction. The change in objects from<br />

material goods to signs allows for different entities<br />

in life to also become signs. Baudrillard<br />

notices this with relationships between people;<br />

the ability to commoditize a relationship<br />

through sign placement allows for the relation<br />

to be consumed.<br />

attention must be given to the understanding<br />

of objects as signs and their interchangeability.<br />

In this perspective, objects cannot be tied<br />

to function but to a sign that depends on the<br />

recognition and/or interpretation done by the<br />

owner. This fluidity of signification is something<br />

new to objects. This allows the desire for<br />

objects to widen and include a desire for signs,<br />

creating more wants to be satisfied. The manipulation<br />

of sign into an object<br />

personalizes the experience for<br />

the consumer while broadening<br />

the target group of an item. Multiple<br />

signs may exist in one item<br />

ensuring more connection to<br />

consumers. Baudrillard believes<br />

that tracing specific needs is impossible<br />

because they no longer<br />

exist; they have been replaced<br />

by desires that are created and<br />

are not inherent. Consumers no<br />

longer look for objects to fill a<br />

need, but for signs to fulfill a desire.<br />

Because false needs are not<br />

natural needs and desire is limitless,<br />

satisfaction and fulfillment<br />

are impossible. Baudrillard states<br />

that if satisfaction is impossible,<br />

defining a need to be satisfied is<br />

also impossible, and thus needs<br />

can no longer be defined at all.<br />

Thus, “the system of consumption<br />

is based on a code of signs<br />

and differences, and not on need<br />

and pleasure”. This shifts the<br />

needs/wants debate because it<br />

takes it out of the context of definable<br />

needs and points to the<br />

inability of the desire of signs to<br />

provide satisfaction, highlighting<br />

the failure of consumption<br />

to create happiness. Human<br />

Interaction The importance of<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!