Publication (142 pages).
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
terpretation of<br />
ow social acf<br />
the behaviour.<br />
roach is pars<br />
for several<br />
ing as a social<br />
ing the differhat<br />
produce an<br />
s problematic.<br />
e development<br />
ng as a social<br />
laims and a difand<br />
subjective<br />
social problems. They believed a social<br />
problem to be less a fact in existence<br />
and more an ongoing activity in society.<br />
They define social problems as “the activities<br />
of individuals or groups making<br />
assertions of grievances and claims with<br />
respect to some putative conditions”.<br />
The purpose of the study of social problems<br />
becomes not to locate and identify<br />
the objective conditions that constitute<br />
the problem, but to explore the<br />
social activities that come to define the<br />
situation as problematic. This means<br />
that objective conditions may or may<br />
not play a role in the defining of the<br />
social problem; instead the important<br />
factor is the identification of the assertions<br />
being made about the objective<br />
conditions. As opposed to objective<br />
conditions, the constructionist perspective<br />
involves examining what Spector<br />
and Kitsuse call ‘claims-making activities’.<br />
They argue that claims-making<br />
includes interaction between a claimant<br />
and another party about the mentioned<br />
condition. They also mention<br />
that the “claimant has a right at least to<br />
be heard,if not to receive satisfaction”.<br />
This brings the claimant and the type<br />
of claim into the centre of the social<br />
problem discussion, removing the focus<br />
on objective aspects. This approach<br />
requires consideration for the people<br />
47