17.12.2012 Views

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Structure Prediction of CPPs and Iterative Development of Novel CPPs 211<br />

TABLE 9.2<br />

Internalization of Simulated Peptides as a Function<br />

of the Inner Sheet Superficial Charge Density<br />

Inner sheet charge<br />

(e – /Å 2 ) AntHD + DNA AntHD 1st helix 2nd helix pAntp<br />

No charge – – – – –<br />

0.005 – – – – –<br />

0.01 – – – – +<br />

0.02 – – – – +<br />

0.04 – ± ± + ++<br />

The AntHD–DNA complex stabilizes when its mass center is located at a distance<br />

of 28 Å, where the minimum value of the total restraint is reached. This is<br />

closer to the bilayer than when this one is uncharged, due to the charge restraint,<br />

which tends to bring the complex close to the membrane. Nevertheless, there is no<br />

membrane insertion because the hydrophobic restraint increases, thus impairing any<br />

insertion. From 28 to 25 Å, the total restraint increases, suggesting that a localization<br />

of the complex close to the membrane is unlikely.<br />

The lipid perturbation restraint is low (maximum value: 8 kJ/mol.Å 2 ) compared<br />

with the other restraints. This is consistent since the complex only partially penetrates<br />

within the polar head domain; therefore, it does not disturb the acyl chains of the<br />

phospholipids. When the homeodomain is not associated with the DNA<br />

(Figure 9.9B), its mass center comes near the external bilayer leaflet because of the<br />

charge distribution in the internal leaflet. Here again, the hydrophilic and hydrophobic<br />

balance of the homeodomain prevents the crossing: the hydrophobic restraint is<br />

unfavorable from 28 Å and increases when the homeodomain mass center<br />

approaches the bilayer.<br />

The same graphics have been made for simulations of the isolated helices<br />

(Figure 9.9C, D, E, bottom). Moreover, in every helix we chose two reference atoms<br />

to draw a segment parallel to the helix axis. This allowed us to follow the evolution<br />

of the total restraint as a function of the positions of the mass center and of the<br />

angles of the helix axis vs. the bilayer plane center (Figure 9.9C, D, E, top).<br />

Now, considering each helix separately, it appears that, for the first helix, which<br />

is the less charged, the most probable position is reached when its mass center is<br />

located at 20 Å. When the mass center gets closer to the membrane both hydrophobic<br />

and charge restraints increase. At the energy minimum, the helix makes an angle of<br />

–5° (from the N-term to the C-term) with respect to the bilayer plane; several residues<br />

(Gln3, Leu7, Phe11) therefore enter within the polar heads domain (results not<br />

shown).<br />

For the second helix observations are similar, but the charge restraint is more<br />

favorable (this helix has a charge of +4.00). The mass center is then located at the<br />

external limit of the polar heads of the external leaflet (18 Å). Here again, hydrophobic<br />

restraint prevents the penetration of the second helix into the hydrophobic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!