17.12.2012 Views

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Signal Peptides 307<br />

14.4.2.2 Specificity of Type I Signal Peptidases<br />

As noted above, signal peptides have a weak consensus pattern around their cleavage<br />

site known as the (–3, –1) rule. 153 Namely, the residues at positions –3 and –1 from<br />

the cleavage site are small (and neutral) such as alanine in most cases. In eukaryotes,<br />

this requirement is less stringent, allowing glycines and serines as well as alanines;<br />

it is more stringent in thylakoid membrane. 169,172,173 With experimental analyses, this<br />

rule was confirmed as the substrate specificity of type I signal peptidases. However,<br />

because the consensus pattern is so weak, many other potential consensus sites could<br />

be around the authentic site in a preprotein. More importantly, it seems difficult to<br />

discriminate signal-anchored proteins from proteins with cleavable signal peptides<br />

by mere existence of such a consensus pattern. 151<br />

Several experiments show that the degree of hydrophobicity in h-region affects<br />

the cleavage. 174 For example, signal peptides become uncleavable when their hregion<br />

is artificially extended. 175 The three-dimensional structure of a catalytic Nterminal<br />

fragment of E. coli type I signal peptidase gives some hints on this<br />

enigma. 176,177 The structure shows that the c-region must be in an extended conformation;<br />

since transmembrane segments in integral membrane proteins are generally<br />

longer and more hydrophobic than the h-region of signal peptides, these segments<br />

may not be able to be properly positioned at the catalytic site. However, this idea<br />

was challenged by a recent experiment in which both the lack of transmembrane<br />

region of signal peptidases and mutations in the h-region of signal peptides did not<br />

affect the correct cleavage site selection. 178<br />

Structures of the mature protein can also affect the cleavage. For example,<br />

removal of N-terminal cytoplasmic tail of a type II membrane anchor protein could<br />

lead to the cleavage of its transmembrane region; 179 in another example, the transmembrane<br />

region near the C terminus can affect the cleavage of signal peptides. 180<br />

Thus, the prediction of signal-anchored proteins is still a difficult problem (see<br />

Section 14.5.1).<br />

14.4.2.3 Other Types of Signal Peptidases<br />

Type II signal peptidases (signal peptidases II) are found in eubacteria but not in<br />

archaea. These peptidases cleave the signal peptides of so-called lipoproteins (lipidmodified<br />

proteins) after the lipid modification. They show a clearer substrate specificity<br />

than type I peptidases: the lipobox, is typically represented as LA(G/A) | C,<br />

where | denotes the cleavage site. 181,182 The cysteine residue is linked by a fatty acid<br />

and the protein is anchored at the membrane with this lipid molecule. The leucine at<br />

the –3 position may be other large hydrophobic residues. In B. subtilis, signal peptidase<br />

II is required for efficient secretion of α-amylase, a nonlipoprotein. 183 Therefore, the<br />

substrate specificity of signal peptidase II may not be restricted to lipoproteins.<br />

The third type of signal peptidase is PilD (XcpA), which specifically cleaves<br />

preproteins related to pilus biogenesis, 184-186 which is related to the so-called type II<br />

protein export pathway. 187 In this pathway, the leader sequences are exceptional in<br />

that they are basic and short. PilD not only cleaves these leader peptides but also<br />

subsequently monomethylates the newly exposed N-terminal phenylalanine.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!