17.12.2012 Views

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Toxicity and Side Effects of Cell-Penetrating Peptides 255<br />

disturbance is caused by CPPs with higher yield of accumulation into the cells (ratio<br />

between the intra- and extracellular concentration of CPP at the equilibrium), for<br />

instance, MAP and transportan. This suggests that the membrane-disturbing effects<br />

of CPPs, exerted at plasma membrane, depend primarily on their intracellular or<br />

membrane concentration and not so much on the applied concentration.<br />

It is difficult to estimate the exact intracellular concentration of CPPs. The<br />

intramembrane concentration is even more difficult to assess, making correlation to<br />

membrane toxicity practically impossible. Usually, intracellular CPP concentration<br />

is determined by using fluorescein-labeled peptides. However, fluorescein is sensitive<br />

to its surrounding environment, which can cause not only errors when estimating<br />

the concentration, but also assumed change in intracellular localization pattern. 20<br />

Usually the CPP efficiency to translocate into cells as well as the toxicity is<br />

estimated on cells growing in culture where cells are at different stages in the cell<br />

cycle. The amphipathic synthetic peptide NAc-GALFLGWLGAAGSTMGAWSQP-<br />

KKKRKV-cysteamide has been shown to exert cell cycle-dependent toxicity. 39 This<br />

peptide is more toxic to proliferating cells than confluent H9C2 cells, but minimally<br />

or quiescent to differentiated cells. This fact must be considered when in vitro results<br />

are the only basis for explaining in vivo results.<br />

11.2.3 SIDE EFFECTS OF CPPS IN VITRO<br />

Most described side effects of CPPs are based on in vitro toxicity data. This is mainly<br />

due to the high importance of a nontoxic delivery vector and the relative ease of<br />

finding a relevant assay. However, all the plausible side effects of CPPs cannot be<br />

comprehended by studying cell toxicity.<br />

The remarkable high positive net charge of most CPPs causes their tight binding<br />

to polyanions. Indeed, penetratin binds heparin 40 and interacts strongly with polysialic<br />

acid of the cell-surface glycosides. 41 Probably most CPPs can interact strongly<br />

with DNA or RNA and the interaction with negatively charged polysialic acid has<br />

been suggested to mediate the efficient uptake of pAntp by neurons. 40<br />

The ability of CPPs to translocate into cells and their in vitro toxicity is relatively<br />

well characterized, but still other biological activities are only known for Tat peptide<br />

and transportan. The absence of data for other CPPs does not necessarily mean that<br />

they are devoid of side effects.<br />

11.2.3.1 Transportan<br />

The chimeric molecule of transportan comprises the fragment of neuropeptide galanin<br />

and a peptide from wasp venom — mastoparan. Indeed, transportan has some<br />

characteristic features of galanin: it interferes with galanin ( 125 I-galanin) binding to<br />

type 1 galanin receptors in BMC membranes, at rather low concentration (K D<br />

17.4 nM). 42 Transportan, like mastoparan, modulates the activity of membranous Gproteins.<br />

Surprisingly, in contrast to mastoparan, which activates G-proteins, transportan<br />

possesses an inhibitory effect (EC 50 of 21.1 µM) on them. It is not clear<br />

whether these effects of transportan are caused by direct binding of the peptide to the<br />

receptor and G-proteins or by changing membrane properties and thereby modulating

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!