17.12.2012 Views

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kinetics of Uptake of Cell-Penetrating Peptides 287<br />

The advantage of this approach is the simultaneous fitting of the curves for all<br />

five initial concentrations (A 0) of [ 125 I]–biotinyl–transportan. Consequently, values<br />

obtained for the rate constants (k 1 = 0.019 min –1 , k 2 = 0.15 min –1 , k 3 = 0.058 min –1 ,<br />

k 4 = 0.27 min –1 , and k 5 = 0.0039 min –1 ) are equally valid for all curves. The ratio<br />

between constants for uptake of TP (k 1) and its release (k 2) and the ratio of volumes<br />

outside and inside the cells are in accordance with a maximal accumulation of<br />

[ 125 I]–biotinyl–transportan detected in the cells (see above). On the other hand, the<br />

ratio of the constants for uptake (k 4) and release (k 5) of the degradation products<br />

corresponds to the ratio of intracellular (2 to 5 µl) and extracellular (100 µl) volumes.<br />

This suggests that degradation products do not accumulate in the membranes and<br />

that transportan could be degraded in the cells.<br />

Not only the maximal fraction of TP that internalizes into the cells (9 to 16%<br />

of total amount of peptide; see above), but also the distribution of TP between<br />

membranes and inner cellular solutions is of particular interest, although difficult to<br />

determine. Additional experiments by the authors 8 revealed that the fraction released<br />

from the outer surface of the cells after treating cells with the acidic solution was<br />

less than 2%, pointing to a very small amount of TP that was loosely bound to the<br />

outer membrane surface. 8,9 Even less is known about the interaction of TP with the<br />

inner hydrophobic leaflet of the membrane. Molecular modeling revealed a possibility<br />

of a stable interaction between the lipid bilayer and TP, 9 and membrane-specific<br />

staining procedure disclosed the presence of TP in practically all membrane structures<br />

of the cell. 8<br />

Very little is known regarding differences in the specificity of TP for various<br />

types of the cell membranes. However, intracellular distribution of TP coincides<br />

with staining of high mannose-containing membrane proteins by FITC-conjugated<br />

concavalin A. It is interesting that, after longer incubations (more than 1 h), TP<br />

concentrates in the nuclear membrane and nuclei, where it localizes predominantly<br />

in the nucleoli. 8 More detailed studies of the localization of TP have not been carried<br />

out yet; neither has the kinetics of internalization of TP in particular cell structure<br />

been undertaken.<br />

13.4.2 TRANSPORTAN ANALOGUES<br />

A number of transportan analogs have been synthesized. These analogues can be<br />

divided into two classes: first, the analogues denoted TP2–TP6 where specific parts<br />

in the original TP sequence were replaced by other sequences, 7 and second, the TP<br />

analogues, denoted TP7–TP15, derived from TP by deletion of groups of amino<br />

acids from various parts of the original TP sequence. 9<br />

As described in detail in Chapter 3, TP is a chimeric peptide composed of two<br />

natural peptides: galanin (1–13) fragment of neuropeptide galanin in N terminus and<br />

mastoparan, a component of wasp toxin, in C terminus. In analogues TP2–TP6, each<br />

part of TP was selectively modified in order to reveal its role in the cell internalization.<br />

7 The differences between TP and TP2 peptides are in the C-terminal where<br />

transportan 2 contains the inactive mastoparan analogue, Mas 17. 20 In TP3, the<br />

galanin part of the peptide was exchanged by the synthetic vaso<strong>press</strong>in antagonist

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!