17.12.2012 Views

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

310 Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Processes and Applications<br />

can also affect the dependency. For example, based on the mutational study, it was<br />

proposed that kinked signal peptides may approach SRP more closely. 205 In another<br />

study, leucine-rich or chemically denatured signal peptides were shown to increase<br />

the tendency for interacting with SRP. 206 Thus, SRP may have a chaperone function<br />

by maintaining the favorable conformation of signal peptides during their targeting.<br />

The recognition of signal peptides must compete with the recognition of other<br />

sorting signals in eukaryotic cells. However, apart from recognition of signal anchors<br />

and some exceptions, sequence features of signal peptides are rather unique and<br />

prediction of signal peptides from given amino acid sequences is relatively easier<br />

than prediction of mitochondrial targeting signals or chloroplast transit signals (see<br />

the following section). According to our extensive search of the optimized rule for<br />

signal sequence detection, only the sum of the hydropathy value 207 from the 6th<br />

residue to the 25th residue was a sufficiently powerful predictor. 208<br />

14.5 PREDICTIVE AND PROTEOME ANALYSES<br />

In the post-genomic era, prediction of signal peptides and the systematic analyses<br />

of secreted proteins within a proteome are of special importance. Prediction of signal<br />

peptides enables us to annotate open reading frames with no known homologous<br />

proteins. It can be used for screening candidates for drug targets. This situation<br />

might explain a part of the reason why a prediction program, SignalP, was enthusiastically<br />

welcomed; its paper is cited in ISI’s Red Hot Research list of 1997. 173 Not<br />

only theoretical works but also direct experimental studies on secreted proteins are<br />

now becoming major projects. Of course, both kinds of studies are desirable in order<br />

to stimulate each other.<br />

14.5.1 PREDICTION ALGORITHMS<br />

Predictive recognition of signal peptides has been most successful among predictions<br />

of various protein-sorting signals. Most of these algorithms can also predict cleavage<br />

sites. Although attempts have been made to detect candidate proteins dependent on<br />

the Tat-dependent pathway, all currently available prediction methods seem to deal<br />

with Sec-dependent signal peptides only. In addition, the distinction between SRPdependent<br />

and SRP-independent pathways has not been attempted, probably because<br />

of lack of sufficient data.<br />

It should also be noted that the existence of signal peptide is not always clear<br />

in a biological sense; a fraction of proteins with “weak” signal peptides can remain<br />

in the cytosol. 134 Moreover, it seems difficult to describe the optimized features of<br />

signal peptides because they are recognized by different proteins, e.g., SRP and<br />

translocon. The prediction of signal peptides has recently been reviewed by several<br />

authors, including myself. 188,209-211 Essentially, there are two approaches for the<br />

prediction of signal peptides: window-based methods and global structure-based<br />

methods. The former is conveniently divided into weight matrix methods and artificial<br />

neural network-based methods.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!