17.12.2012 Views

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264 Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Processes and Applications<br />

because it is indeed translocated by the aid of the transport peptide. The most<br />

frequently applied reporter group in in vitro studies so far is biotin, which is detected<br />

with fluorescently labeled streptavidin–avidin visualized in a fluorescence microscope<br />

or quantified by, for example, fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) analysis<br />

or fluorescence spectrophotometry.<br />

Various cargo molecules, oligonucleotides (ONs), peptide nucleic acid (PNA),<br />

drugs, peptides, and proteins have been successfully transported by CPPs into a<br />

great selection of cell types (for review, see Lindgren et al. 1 ). More recently, CPPs<br />

have also been applied in in vivo studies. Chemical conjugation by disulfide bonds<br />

or in-chain synthesis (for peptides and PNA) are the two main methods for conjugation<br />

of cargo to the CPP. In addition, recombinantly ex<strong>press</strong>ed fusion proteins<br />

have been used for the Tat protein and Tat peptides. The importance of detachment<br />

of the cargo from the transport peptide in case of intracellularly cleavable disulfide<br />

bonds is a debated matter. It could be argued that if the CPP is not disturbing the<br />

cargo’s intracellular activity a detachment is not necessary. The CPP could, in fact,<br />

provide a useful protection against degradation.<br />

Despite all of the quantification methods available today, with exception of direct<br />

antibody detection, it is the amount of a cargo–reporter group that is measured and<br />

not the amount of the CPP, as would be desired. In experiments where only a<br />

qualitative indication of intracellular delivery is sufficient, biotin is a useful label,<br />

but when quantification of the uptake is essential, fluorescence labeling of the CPP<br />

or cargo is more convenient.<br />

In this chapter, various methods to quantify the efficiency of CPP uptake are<br />

compared. Emphasis is on methods in which the main interest has been to characterize<br />

the CPP itself. There are also a great number of publications where the focus<br />

has been on activity of the cargo delivered by the CPP; these are only briefly reviewed<br />

in this chapter.<br />

12.2 QUANTIFICATION METHODS<br />

The concentration range of CPP used during uptake experiments is crucial for exact<br />

quantification. A cell-penetrating peptide is defined as a peptide primarily entering<br />

the cell — not via endocytosis or by pore formation. Several CPPs cause pore<br />

formation or have lythic activity, e.g., transportan and model amphipatic peptide<br />

(MAP), but it is negligible 2 at low concentrations (lower than 5 µM). In contrast,<br />

endocytosis contributes to the uptake of Tat fragments. 3 As described in Chapter 11,<br />

dye leakage assays or tritiated-glucose leakage can be used to detect and quantify<br />

membrane disturbing effects of CPPs.<br />

Another important challenge when quantifying CPP uptake is to distinguish<br />

between membrane- or cell-associated peptide and intracellular CPP. For example,<br />

Oehlke et al. (see Chapter 4) have used a method in which the membrane-bound<br />

peptide is modified in order to discriminate it from intracellular MAP. 4 In the studies<br />

of 2-amino benzoic acid (Abz)-labeled transportan (Figure 12.1), a trypsin treatment<br />

has been applied. 5 Furthermore, acid wash and oil centrifugation, 6 and reductionsensitive<br />

7-nitrobenz-2-oxo-1,3-diazol (NBD) fluorophore 7 have been utilized for the<br />

distinction between membrane-associated and internalized CPP. However, inactivation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!