17.12.2012 Views

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Processes and Applications<br />

The total uptake displayed a roughly linear dependence of the amount of total<br />

construct in the experiment, showing that the transport mechanism was not saturated<br />

and that the upper limit of construct import (if such limits exist) was not reached<br />

within the concentration range used. At saturation, the cargo concentration inside<br />

the cells was about 400-fold higher than that which remained extracellularly, showing<br />

that transportan is indeed very efficient in delivering small peptides to the cytoplasm.<br />

In this assay, rate of transportan uptake was shown to be close to the rate obtained<br />

with the peptide itself. Moreover, transportan uptake was shown not to be disturbed<br />

by the presence of 10% fetal bovine serum in the incubation medium.<br />

3.6.2 DELIVERY OF PNA<br />

Synthetic molecules that can specifically inhibit translation or transcription hold<br />

great promise as potential antisense and antigene drugs. The novel DNA mimics<br />

polyamide/peptide nucleic acid (PNA); 25 locked (LNA) 26 and morpholino nucleic<br />

acids 27 have probably the highest potential as antisense reagents, since they reveal<br />

high stability in biological fluids as well as in vivo conditions in general. Moreover,<br />

they show low toxicity and strong, specific pairing with complementary singlestranded<br />

RNA/DNA.<br />

Among these DNA analogues, PNA with a noncharged achiral polyamide backbone<br />

to which the nucleobases are attached is one of the best studied. 28 Unfortunately,<br />

the uptake of unmodified PNA by most cell types in culture as well as in vivo is<br />

poor, especially at low or medium concentrations. 29 Consequently, in order to reach<br />

intracellular PNA concentration necessary for biological action, high or extremely<br />

high extracellular (20 to 100 µM) concentrations are usually applied. 30<br />

To circumvent this problem, we used transportan to facilitate the cellular uptake<br />

of PNA. A disulfide bond was formed between an extra cysteine on ε-NH Lys 13 of<br />

transportan and the biotinyl-Cys of PNA oligomer. Usually 4 to 8 h incubation with<br />

10 to 20 µM biotinyl-PNA is needed to yield intracellular concentration detectable<br />

by indirect immunofluorescence. In contrast, transportan-PNA constructs (TP-PNA)<br />

enter cells at remarkable speed; 5 to 10 min incubation of Bowes melanoma cells<br />

with 2 to 3 µM TP-PNA is sufficient for internalization of detectable amounts of<br />

biotinyl-PNA. Prolonging incubation to 2 to 4 h leads to accumulation of PNA in<br />

the cells and concentrations as low as 0.1 µM extracellular TP-PNA lead to a cellular<br />

concentration detectable by fluorescence. 29<br />

The cellular internalization of unmodified PNA at high concentrations results<br />

predominantly in granular staining, suggesting that the cells take up “naked” PNA<br />

by constitutive (or induced) endocytosis. After 4 to 8 h incubation, the delivered<br />

PNA is trapped in vesicular structures like endosomes or lysosomes and stays<br />

inactive. Later the staining spreads in the cell and is localized more diffusely,<br />

implying that part of the PNA has been liberated from lysosomes.<br />

The cellular distribution of transportan-delivered PNA resembles that of transportan<br />

only at very initial steps of internalization (up to 5 min). Later their localizations<br />

do not overlap, confirming that, in the cell interior, the cargo is liberated<br />

from the carrier peptide after disulfide bond reduction and can follow its own signals<br />

for intracellular routing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!