crc press - E-Lib FK UWKS

Signal Peptides 323
192. Beck, K. et al., Discrimination between SRP- and SecA/SecB-dependent substrates
involves selective recognition of nascent chains by SRP and trigger factor, EMBO J.,
19, 134, 2000.
193. Delgado–Partin, V.M. and Dalbey, R.E., The protein motive force, acting on acidic
residues, promotes translocation of amino-terminal domains of membrane proteins
when the hydrophiobicity of the translocation signal is low, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 9927,
1998.
194. Rösch, K. et al., The topogenic contribution of uncharged amino acids on signal
sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 14916, 2000.
195. Wahlberg, J.M. and Spiess, M., Multiple determinants direct the orientation of signalanchor
proteins: the topogenic role of the hydrophobic signal domain, J. Cell Biol.,
137, 555, 1997.
196. Cristóbal, S. et al., Competition between Sec- and TAT-dependent protein translocation
in Eschericha coli, EMBO J., 18, 2982, 1999.
197. Chaddock, A.M. et al., A new type of signal peptide: central role of a twin-arginine
motif in transfer signals for the ∆pH-dependent thylakoidal protein translocase,
EMBO J., 14, 2715, 1995.
198. Brink, S. et al., Targeting of thylakoid proteins by the ∆pH-driven twin-arginine
translocation pathway requires a specific signal in the hydrophobic domain in conjunction
with the two-arginine motif, FEBS Lett., 434, 425, 1998.
199. Stanley, N.R., Palmer, T., and Berks, B.C., The twin arginine consensus motif of Tat
signal peptides is involved in Sec-independent protein targeting in Escherichia coli,
J. Biol. Chem., 275, 11591, 2000.
200. Hinsley, A.P. et al., A naturally occurring bacterial Tat signal peptide lacking one of
the “invariant” arginine residues of the consensus targeting motif, FEBS Lett., 497,
45, 2001.
201. Mori, H. and Cline, K., A signal peptide that directs non-Sec transport in bacteria
also directs efficient and exclusive transport on the thylakoid ∆pH pathway, J. Biol.
Chem., 273, 11405, 1998.
202. Blaudeck, N. et al., Specificity of signal peptide recognition in tat-dependent bacterial
protein translocation, J. Bacteriol., 183, 604, 2001.
203. Bogsch, E., Brink, S., and Robinson, C., Pathway specificity for a ∆pH-dependent
precursor thylakoid lumen protein is governed by a “Sec-avoidance” motif in the
transfer peptide and a “Sec-incompatible” mature protein, EMBO J., 16, 3851, 1997.
204. Ng, T.W., Brown, J.D., and Walter, P., Signal sequences specify the targeting route
to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, J. Cell Biol., 134, 269, 1996.
205. Matoba, S. and Ogrydziak, D.M., Another factor besides hydrophobicity can affect
signal peptide interaction with signal recognition particle, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 18841,
1998.
206. Zheng, T. and Nicchitta, C.V., Structural determinants for signal sequence function
in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 36623, 1999.
207. Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R.F., A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character
of a protein, J. Mol. Biol., 157, 105, 1982.
208. Bannai, H. et al., Extensive feature detection of N-terminal protein sorting signals,
Bioinformatics, 18, 298, 2002.
209. Claros, M.G., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G., Prediction of N-terminal protein sorting
signals, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 7, 394, 1997.
210. Nielsen, H., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G., Machine learning approaches for the
prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals, Protein Eng., 12, 3, 1999.