17.12.2012 Views

part a: strategic overview - Department of Education

part a: strategic overview - Department of Education

part a: strategic overview - Department of Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Graph 1: Provincial Population Growth 1996-2001<br />

Eastern Cape<br />

Free State<br />

Gauteng<br />

KwaZulu-Natal<br />

Limpopo<br />

Mpumalanga<br />

North West<br />

Northern Cape<br />

Western Cape<br />

Growth % 1996 to<br />

2001<br />

-10.0% -5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%<br />

There are certain difficulties associated with making comparisons between the 1996 and 2001<br />

Censuses. Prior to the release <strong>of</strong> the 2001 Census data for the Eastern Cape for example,<br />

Statistics South Africa estimated the provincial population at 6.978 million, which is<br />

considerably higher than the 2001 Census figure <strong>of</strong> 6.43 million. The Bureau <strong>of</strong> Market<br />

Research released a similar estimate <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> the province in 2001, placing it at<br />

6.976, and stated that the original Census figure for 1996 was an undercount. Both <strong>of</strong> these<br />

estimates differ markedly from the actual 2001 Census figure released for the province which<br />

was 6.4 million - in the region <strong>of</strong> ½ million less people than previously estimated. The<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> sub-provincial population growth estimates is thus problematic – which<br />

estimates does one use? For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this report a direct comparison will be made<br />

between the two sets <strong>of</strong> Census data and not the interim population estimates described<br />

above. This means that one is comparing two actual population censuses, notwithstanding<br />

the disputes concerning whether the figures were accurate or not.<br />

In order to derive the 1996 Census population figures for the new (post 2001) <strong>Education</strong><br />

Districts, a two-stage process was followed. Firstly, new <strong>Education</strong> District boundaries were<br />

overlain on the 18 276 Enumerator Area boundaries that existed in the 1996 Census. A code<br />

was then assigned to each enumerator area to identify the <strong>Education</strong> District that it fell within.<br />

This was then used as the basis for creating population figures for <strong>Education</strong> Districts from<br />

the 1996 Census.<br />

The 2001 figures were derived by assigning codes to the Municipalities, Wards and place<br />

names described in Table 27 that fell within each <strong>Education</strong> District.<br />

The estimated distribution <strong>of</strong> total population by education district for the period 1996 and<br />

2001 is shown in the table below<br />

5 Year ECDoE Strategic Plan for 2005/06 2005-06 to 2009/10 2009-10. March 21 F (3) 2006 Page 59 Page 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!