20.12.2012 Views

Teaching With the Brain in Mind

Teaching With the Brain in Mind

Teaching With the Brain in Mind

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Teach<strong>in</strong>g</strong> with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bra<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> M<strong>in</strong>d<br />

FIGURE 10.1<br />

Mean<strong>in</strong>g-Mak<strong>in</strong>g Occurs <strong>in</strong> Many Areas of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Bra<strong>in</strong></strong><br />

Frontal Lobe:<br />

optimism,<br />

patternmak<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

& context<br />

Parietal Lobe:<br />

<strong>in</strong>sights,<br />

<strong>in</strong>spiration<br />

"felt" mean<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

satisfaction, &<br />

pleasure<br />

Temporal Lobe:<br />

relevance, l<strong>in</strong>ks<br />

with <strong>the</strong> past<br />

Cerebellum:<br />

motion &<br />

novelty<br />

Occipital<br />

Lobe:<br />

patterndiscovery<br />

& spatial<br />

order<br />

Posner. If it’s a more spiritual mean<strong>in</strong>g, it’s probably<br />

a parietal lobe activity, says V.I. Ramachandran<br />

at <strong>the</strong> University of California at San Diego. If it’s<br />

an emotionally felt mean<strong>in</strong>g, it may show activity<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> frontal, occipital, and mid-bra<strong>in</strong> areas, says<br />

University of Iowa’s Antonio Damasio. If it’s an<br />

“Ah-ha!” type of mean<strong>in</strong>g, it is more likely a left<br />

frontal lobe activity. These diverse areas of location<br />

suggest that <strong>the</strong> concept of mean<strong>in</strong>g also may be<br />

diverse (see fig. 10.1).<br />

In short, mean<strong>in</strong>g is complex. We know <strong>the</strong><br />

correlations, but we don’t have causal relationships.<br />

Evidence suggests <strong>the</strong>se factors are likely:<br />

relevance, emotions, and context and pattern mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Relevance is a function of <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong>’s mak<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

connection from exist<strong>in</strong>g neural sites. Emotions are<br />

triggered by <strong>the</strong> bra<strong>in</strong>’s chemistry, and context triggers<br />

pattern mak<strong>in</strong>g that may be related to <strong>the</strong> formation<br />

or activation of larger neural fields. All<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g has at least one of those three <strong>in</strong>gredients,<br />

92<br />

but <strong>the</strong> reverse is not true. Someth<strong>in</strong>g could be<br />

relevant and still be mean<strong>in</strong>gless at <strong>the</strong> same time.<br />

Eat<strong>in</strong>g a nutritionally sound diet is very relevant.<br />

It might also have little mean<strong>in</strong>g to most students.<br />

The Importance of Relevance<br />

What’s <strong>the</strong> biology of relevance? It’s one of <strong>the</strong><br />

easiest, most commonly made, types of mean<strong>in</strong>g. It<br />

happens on a simple cellular level. An already exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

neuron simply “connects” with a nearby neuron.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> content is irrelevant, it’s unlikely a connection<br />

will be made. While neurons are constantly fir<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

much of <strong>the</strong> time it’s an <strong>in</strong>audible chatter. Relevant<br />

connections are made more often, and that streng<strong>the</strong>ns<br />

<strong>the</strong>m. Every thought you th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>the</strong><br />

chances of your th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g that thought aga<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Some thoughts activate entire neural fields that<br />

may cross cell and axon boundaries. The greater<br />

<strong>the</strong> number of l<strong>in</strong>ks and associations that your<br />

bra<strong>in</strong> creates, <strong>the</strong> more neural territories <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

and <strong>the</strong> more firmly <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation is woven <strong>in</strong><br />

neurologically. Conversations were so rich with<br />

Nobel laureate Buckm<strong>in</strong>ster Fuller because he<br />

could make so many associations that nearly everyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rem<strong>in</strong>ded him of nearly everyth<strong>in</strong>g else. A<br />

conversation about birds might br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> history<br />

of bird watch<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g food supply, economics<br />

of conservation, geography, <strong>the</strong> economics<br />

of birds, biology, love, rituals, myth, politics, and<br />

beauty. To him, nearly everyth<strong>in</strong>g was relevant.<br />

For many students, <strong>the</strong> problem is <strong>the</strong> opposite.<br />

Classroom <strong>in</strong>formation lacks <strong>the</strong> personal relevance<br />

necessary for any mean<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Practical Suggestions for Mak<strong>in</strong>g Mean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Never assume that because someth<strong>in</strong>g is relevant<br />

to you, it’s relevant to your students. Help <strong>the</strong>m

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!