17.06.2020 Views

The Color of Law A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America by Richard Rothstein (z-lib.org).epub

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Herbers 1969; Lilley 1970; Bonastia 2006; Danielson 1976;

McDonald 1970; Lamb 2005, and Lemann 1991, 209.

p. 203, 2 Sharkey 2014, 925 (table 2). The data are from 2000. Sharkey

defines a middle-class family as one with annual income of at least

$30,000, and a “severely disadvantaged” census tract as one where

the concentration of welfare receipt, poverty, unemployment,

female-headed households, and young children is more than two

standard deviations above the national average.

p. 204, 2 This is not intended as a fully developed proposal. Metropolitan

areas with smaller African American populations would require a

different fair share definition. Perhaps, for example, metropolitan

areas with a black population of 10 percent should define their

suburbs as segregated if their African American population is less

than 5 percent.

p. 205, 1 Racioppi and Akin 2015; O’Dea 2015; Krefetz 2000–1; Herr 2002;

Smart Growth America 2016; Massey et al. 2013. In New Jersey

until 2008, towns (in practice, towns with wealthier residents) were

permitted to evade this requirement by paying other towns to

assume their fair share obligations. Legislation prohibiting this

arrangement was adopted in 2008. In 2015, the New Jersey

Supreme Court, confronted with foot-dragging by wealthy towns

and by the governor, removed responsibility for planning fair share

developments from towns and made this a judicial function.

The Massachusetts 40B program, adopted in 1969, overrides

local exclusionary zoning laws in jurisdictions where less than 10

percent of existing housing is “affordable”—i.e., where rents or

purchase payments can reasonably be made by families whose

income is 80 percent or less than the area’s median income. For

developers to take advantage of this flexibility, at least 25 percent

of the units in their projects must be permanently affordable, after

federal subsidies for low- and moderate-income housing have been

used. Since the law’s passage, the number of jurisdictions where

less than 10 percent of their housing stock is affordable has

declined.

p. 206, 1 Schwartz 2010.

p. 206, 2 Boger 1993.

p. 207, 2 Berdahl-Baldwin 2015; Donovan 2015; Darrah and DeLuca 2014.

The criteria for participation in the Baltimore program are

somewhat more complex than described here but not substantially

different.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!