21.12.2012 Views

COMBAT AND COMPETITION.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

COMBAT AND COMPETITION.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

COMBAT AND COMPETITION.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>COMBAT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>COMPETITION</strong><br />

had no propeller braking and little idea of its gliding angle, it was a<br />

good effort.<br />

We itched to get our hands on the Meteor and Vampire. Not only<br />

were they very different to anything we had flown before but in a real<br />

sense they were a glimpse into the future.<br />

In my case the Meteor came first. The cockpit felt unfamiliar, with<br />

its rather upright seating position and long travel throttles, but the<br />

automatic sequencing system made engine starting easy. The rising<br />

whine of the turbines was an urgent reminder that they were burning<br />

fuel at a vast rate. There was no time to waste. I taxied gingerly, then<br />

faster, adjusting easily to the tricycle undercarriage. Aware that the<br />

Meteor's wheel and air brakes, not to mention its four 20mm cannon,<br />

depended for their operation on the contents of a single compressed air<br />

bottle. For it was still early days and there was no thrust to spare for<br />

engine driven compressors.<br />

Sitting astride the runway centreline 1 listened to the turbines<br />

winding up against the brakes, watching the twin temperature gauges.<br />

Jet pipe temperature was critical on take off and harsh throttle<br />

movements were to be avoided at all costs. Failure to do so was to risk<br />

flooding the combustion chambers with fuel and wrecking the hot<br />

section.<br />

Although the Meteor was easy to fly it was a disappointment. To<br />

be fair the main problem was shortage of thrust, and this was already<br />

in hand on the new Mark IVs which I had seen at Moreton Valence.<br />

But ours were Mark Ills. The acceleration on take off was poor and the<br />

climb sluggish. The ailerons were heavy and the stick force per 'G'<br />

fairly high. Even a short session of aerobatics was hard work.<br />

The approach and landing was quite straightforward, although the<br />

response to changes in throttle setting was much slower than a piston<br />

engine.<br />

On the first occasion, misled by the splendid forward view, I<br />

touched down with the nose too high and continued to hold the stick<br />

hard back, until the aircraft pitched smartly onto its nose wheel. The<br />

tail bumper had to be replaced and there was much leg pulling.<br />

The Vampire I also suffered from lack of thrust. But it was much<br />

more my idea of a jet fighter. The cockpit was simple and functional,<br />

with a gunsight reflecting straight onto the armoured windscreen like<br />

the Typhoon and Tempest. The throttle lever was much better<br />

positioned, with the high pressure cock conveniently close by ,and the<br />

three vital direct reading fuel contents gauges unmistakably visible<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!