21.12.2012 Views

COMBAT AND COMPETITION.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

COMBAT AND COMPETITION.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

COMBAT AND COMPETITION.pdf - Lakes Gliding Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER FIFTEEN FULL CIRCLE<br />

Lasham was urged to purchase them, in partnership with another<br />

leading club, for hire to competitors. In order to reduce the initial cost,<br />

the Committee had opted for those recording to the nearest minute and<br />

could not say when any higher accuracy might become mandatory.<br />

Strange indeed for it was the final arbiter in such matters.<br />

I explained that we had been examining pilot operated starts, had<br />

conducted trials on an alternative 'ground clock' 6 option and were not<br />

prepared to use this method, as a sole source of information, without<br />

more rigorous testing and training. As for time-base cameras, there<br />

could be no question of such an open ended investment as the<br />

Committee could change the specification at any time. Finally, running<br />

a Nationals and two Regional classes from the same site, we would be<br />

faced with simultaneous pilot operated and ground observed starts,<br />

which would further increase the risks of launching an unproved<br />

system.<br />

The committee were unsympathetic and continued to press for pilot<br />

operated starts. So I left them to continue their deliberations in my<br />

absence. We would not change our procedures in 1985.<br />

However we did introduce two other changes. The first, thanks to<br />

an old Elliott Brothers colleague working at British Aerospace, was a<br />

x 7 magnification gyro stabilised monocular. The 'Steadyscope' proved<br />

invaluable. It compensated for 'operator shake' and made the<br />

identification of gliders approaching the start line much easier.<br />

The second - an attempt to introduce faster and more efficient<br />

scoring, through the services of an up market software house - was a<br />

total failure. We briefed them on the BGA scoring system, the data<br />

inputs, the requirements for daily and cumulative results. As the<br />

picture became more complete I provided them with flow diagrams<br />

and we talked about installing TV type displays in the briefing room<br />

and sponsor's chalet.<br />

The first indication that there might be problems occurred when<br />

they attempted a dummy run, late in the practice week, using the raw<br />

data from a training contest. With less than a dozen competitors it took<br />

an age, and much senior executive time, to produce a result which<br />

failed to match the correct scores! Then the senior executives backed<br />

off and, before the Championships were three days old, our scoring<br />

was in deep trouble.<br />

Bad enough, at the best of times, with the competitors and the<br />

sponsor looking for fast results. But on this occasion we had the Duke<br />

of Edinburgh coming to present the prizes and the long range weather<br />

259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!