Philippians and Philemon - MR Vincent - 1906.pdf
Philippians and Philemon - MR Vincent - 1906.pdf
Philippians and Philemon - MR Vincent - 1906.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
16 INTRODUCTION<br />
lines, inspired by the purest Christian feeling, <strong>and</strong> against which<br />
suspicion has never been breathed?" (Fau/us). Rejecting<br />
Ephesians, <strong>Philippians</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Colossians, he is compelled to reject<br />
<strong>Philemon</strong> along with them. The diction is unpauline. Words<br />
<strong>and</strong> expressions occur which are either not found at all in Paul's<br />
epistles, or only in those which Baur rejects. The epistle exhibits<br />
a peculiar conjunction of circumstances in the flight of Onesimus<br />
<strong>and</strong> his meeting St. Paul at Rome, which savors of romance. The<br />
letter is the embryo of a Christian romance like the Clettientine<br />
Recognitions, intended to illustrate the idea that what man loses<br />
in time in this world he regains forever in Christianity ; or that<br />
every believer finds himself again in each of his brethren.<br />
Holtzmann is inclined to receive the epistle, but thinks that<br />
the passage 4-6 shows the h<strong>and</strong> of the author of the Ephesian<br />
letter.<br />
Weizsacker {Apost. Zeital. p. 545) <strong>and</strong> Pfleiderer {Paulinismus,<br />
p. 44) hold that the play on the name Onesimus proves the letter<br />
to be allegorical (see note on vs. 11).<br />
Steck thinks that he has discovered the germ of the letter in<br />
two epistles of the younger Pliny.<br />
It is needless to waste time over these. They are mostly<br />
fancies. The external testimony <strong>and</strong> the general consensus of<br />
critics of nearly all schools are corroborated by the thoroughly<br />
PauUne style <strong>and</strong> diction, <strong>and</strong> by the exhibition of those personal<br />
traits with which the greater epistles have made us familiar. The<br />
letter, as already remarked, was written <strong>and</strong> sent at the same time<br />
with that to the Colossians. Its authenticity goes to establish that<br />
of the longer epistle. " In fact," remarks Sabatier, " this short<br />
letter to <strong>Philemon</strong> is so intensely original, so entirely innocent of<br />
dogmatic preoccupation, <strong>and</strong> Paul's mind has left its impress so<br />
clearly <strong>and</strong> indelibly upon it, that it can only be set aside by an<br />
act of sheer violence. Linked from the first with the Colossian<br />
<strong>and</strong> Ephesian Epistles, it is virtually Paul's own signature appended<br />
as their guarantee to accompany them through the centuries "<br />
{The Apostle Paul, Hellier's trans.).<br />
The general belief from ancient times has been that this, with<br />
the Colossian <strong>and</strong> Ephesian letters, was composed at Rome ; but<br />
the opinion which assigns their composition to Csesarea has hac.<br />
some strong advocates, among whom may be named Reuss,