Philippians and Philemon - MR Vincent - 1906.pdf
Philippians and Philemon - MR Vincent - 1906.pdf
Philippians and Philemon - MR Vincent - 1906.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5, 6] LOVE AND FAITH TO CHRIST AND THE SAINTS 1 79<br />
on Select Readings." (Comp. Tit. iii. 15.) Mey., Win. (1. 2), Beet, render<br />
' fidelity ' or ' faithfulness,' a sense which is found in N.T. though<br />
rarely (see Rom. iii. 3;<br />
i Tim. v. 12; Tit. ii. 10), <strong>and</strong> which is habitual in<br />
LXX. (See Lightf. Comm. on Gal. p. 152, <strong>and</strong> Hatch, Essays in Bib. Gk.<br />
p. 83 ff.). But (i) with-never occurs in this sense in N.T.<br />
.<br />
(See I Cor. xiii. 13; Gal. v. 6; i Thess. i. 3, v. 8; I Tim. i. 14, vi. 11<br />
2 Tim. ii. 22.) This is not affected by the fact<br />
,<br />
that•here precedes<br />
(See Eph. vi. 23.) Gal. v. 22 <strong>and</strong> i Tim. iv. 12 are not in point.<br />
In those passages the words occur in enumerations; <strong>and</strong> in Gal. v. 22<br />
-is entirely detached from ^. (2) in N.T. never<br />
means ' to have fidelity.' The phrase occurs eleven times, <strong>and</strong> always<br />
means ' to have faith.' A very common explanation is by the rhetorical<br />
cAiasmus or cross-reference, by which•is referred to $ dyiovt,<br />
<strong>and</strong> to .. But the examples of chiasmus commonly cited,<br />
even from the class., illustrate mainly the mere arrangement of the words,<br />
as where the adjective <strong>and</strong> the noun are in inverse order in two successive<br />
clauses. (See Jelf, Gram. 904, 3; Farrar, on the rhetoric of St. Paul, Life<br />
<strong>and</strong> Work, i. 626.) Besides, the i)v connects with the entire<br />
clause rpos . . . . . dylovi. The position of indicates that it belongs<br />
to both 77. <strong>and</strong> .<br />
?<br />
Comp. the different arrangement in Col. i. 4.<br />
: 09 nowhere else with as directed at<br />
Christ. Of faith ' towards ' God, i Thess. i. 8. Comp.-<br />
(2 Cor. iii. 4)• commonly with «s in<br />
Paul. (See Rom. v. 8 ; 2 Cor. ii. 8 ; Col. i. 4 ; i Thess. iii. 12 ;<br />
2 Thess. i. 3 ; but comp. 2 Cor. viii. 7 ; i Cor. xvi. 24.) The<br />
use of different prepositions is not to be accounted for on the<br />
ground of Paul's fondness for varying the prepositions without<br />
designing to express a different relation (Mey.). Paul does,<br />
indeed, often use different prepositions in one clause <strong>and</strong> with<br />
reference to one subject in order to define the conception more<br />
accurately (Rom. iii. 30, xi. 36 ; Gal. i. i, ii. 16 ; Col. i. 14) ; but<br />
it is too much to say that no different relation is intended.<br />
See Holtzn. Pastoralbr. p. loi; Winer, xlvii.; Deissmann, Die neutest,<br />
Formel 'in Ckristo Jesu,' pp. 5, 6.<br />
Bearing in mind that ^ . <strong>and</strong> ^ . are so closely<br />
related in this passage (see above, <strong>and</strong> Oltr. ad loc), ir/ao? may be<br />
taken in the sense indicated in the notes on Phil. ii. 30, iv. 6, as<br />
expressing, not the mere direction of faith <strong>and</strong> love towards Christ<br />
(Lightf., Ellic, Alf.), but the relation of loving <strong>and</strong> beheving<br />
intercourse with him ; while th indicates the direct practical<br />
bearing of faith <strong>and</strong> love on the Christian brethren.<br />
in class, occurs frequently of all sorts of personal intercourse. (See<br />
Horn. Od. xiv. 331, xix. 288; Thucyd. ii. 59, iv. 15, vii. 82; Hdt. i. 61.) It<br />
occurs with, €vo^a,,<strong>and</strong> with!in the sense of ' ^'<br />
a pledge<br />
(Thucyd. iv. 51; Xen. Cyr. iii. i, 39).<br />
6. ivepyrjs ycvj^rai *<br />
: that the<br />
communication of thy faith may become (or prove itself) effect-<br />
ual.' The thought grows directly out of eis .<br />
; '<br />
. ., <strong>and</strong>?