25.12.2012 Views

Aspen Physical Property System - Physical Property Models

Aspen Physical Property System - Physical Property Models

Aspen Physical Property System - Physical Property Models

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Where:<br />

The parameters �1and �2depend on the equation-of-state used. In general a<br />

cubic equation-of-state can be written as:<br />

Values for �1and �2 for the Peng-Robinson and the Soave-Redlich-Kwong<br />

equations of state are:<br />

Equation-of-state � 1 � 2<br />

Peng-Robinson<br />

Redlich-Kwong-Soave 1 0<br />

This expression can be used at any pressure as a mixing rule for the<br />

parameter. The mixing rule for b is fixed by equation 3. Even when used at<br />

other pressures, this expression contains the excess Gibbs energy at infinite<br />

pressure. You can use any activity coeffecient model to evaluate the excess<br />

Gibbs energy at infinite pressure. Binary interaction coefficients must be<br />

regressed. The mixing rule used contains as many binary parameters as the<br />

activity coefficient model chosen.<br />

This mixing rule has been used successfully for polar mixtures at high<br />

pressures, such as systems containing light gases. In theory, any activity<br />

coefficient model can be used. But the NRTL equation (as modified by Huron<br />

and Vidal) has demonstrated better performance.<br />

The Huron-Vidal mixing rules combine extreme flexibility with thermodynamic<br />

consistency, unlike many other mole-fraction-dependent equation-of-state<br />

mixing rules. The Huron-Vidal mixing rules do not allow flexibility in the<br />

description of the excess molar volume, but always predict reasonable excess<br />

volumes.<br />

The Huron-Vidal mixing rules are theoretically incorrect for low pressure,<br />

because quadratic mole fraction dependence of the second virial coefficient (if<br />

derived from the equation-of-state) is not preserved. Since equations of state<br />

are primarily used at high pressure, the practical consequences of this<br />

drawback are minimal.<br />

The Gibbs energy at infinite pressure and the Gibbs energy at an arbitrary<br />

high pressure are similar. But the correspondence is not close enough to<br />

make the mixing rule predictive.<br />

There are several methods for modifying the Huron-Vidal mixing rule to make<br />

it more predictive. The following three methods are used in <strong>Aspen</strong> <strong>Physical</strong><br />

<strong>Property</strong> <strong>System</strong> equation-of-state models:<br />

� The modified Huron-Vidal mixing rule, second order approximation<br />

(MHV2)<br />

� The Predictive SRK Method (PSRK)<br />

� The Wong-Sandler modified Huron-Vidal mixing rule (WS)<br />

80 2 Thermodynamic <strong>Property</strong> <strong>Models</strong><br />

(5)<br />

(6)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!