27.12.2012 Views

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1 Superlum<strong>in</strong>al wave propagation<br />

a<br />

!c1=<br />

"r1; r1<br />

c<br />

a p "r1 r1<br />

d<br />

"r2; r2<br />

!c2 =<br />

c<br />

a p "r2 r2<br />

"r1; r1<br />

Figu<strong>re</strong> 2.2: <strong>Wave</strong> guide discussed by Mart<strong>in</strong> and Landauer. The dielectrics and the cent<strong>re</strong> f<strong>re</strong>quency<br />

of the pulse must satisfy !c1 d) is proportional to the <strong>in</strong>put pulse<br />

(x; t) / (x , d , tc;0) ; (2.6)<br />

if the pulse was <strong>in</strong>itially cent<strong>re</strong>d about x = 0. This means that the pulse seems to arrive<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d the barrier at a time t (x , d)=c, without spend<strong>in</strong>g any time <strong>in</strong> the barrier itself.<br />

The derivation was based on a causal theory. However they appea<strong>re</strong>d to be uncerta<strong>in</strong> about<br />

the <strong>in</strong>terp<strong>re</strong>tation and called the <strong>re</strong>sult `an appa<strong>re</strong>nt violation of causality'.<br />

Soon afterwards, Hass and Busch [63] came up with a discussion of the same model. They<br />

focused on the e ect of an <strong>in</strong>c<strong>re</strong>as<strong>in</strong>g barrier thickness by consider<strong>in</strong>g only the di e<strong>re</strong>nce<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!