27.12.2012 Views

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.3 Re ection due to term<strong>in</strong>ation mismatch<br />

1.5<br />

1.25<br />

1<br />

0.75<br />

0.5<br />

0.25<br />

Ω<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14<br />

Figu<strong>re</strong> 3.3: Dispersion <strong>re</strong>lations for the delay l<strong>in</strong>e of g. 3.2 for L =1. The solid curve cor<strong>re</strong>sponds<br />

to the symmetric low-pass mode, the dashed curve to the antisymmetric band-pass mode. The th<strong>in</strong><br />

l<strong>in</strong>es a<strong>re</strong> the l<strong>in</strong>ear approximations for low and high f<strong>re</strong>quencies. Note that the diagonal l<strong>in</strong>e marks<br />

the velocity of light, =K = 1. Thus the band-pass mode exhibits a phase velocity g<strong>re</strong>ater than c<br />

slightly above the lower f<strong>re</strong>quency limit. It is clear to see that the <strong>re</strong>lation vp vg = c 2 mentioned <strong>in</strong><br />

the p<strong>re</strong>vious chapter is not valid he<strong>re</strong>.<br />

with X(!) taken from (3.23). The proof of the identity ve = vg is then straightforward but<br />

tedious.<br />

3.3 Re ection due to term<strong>in</strong>ation mismatch<br />

If we want to exam<strong>in</strong>e evanescence, it is not very sensible to consider a steady-state excitation<br />

of the transmission l<strong>in</strong>e without <strong>re</strong> ection. In such a case, the characteristic impedance (3.5)<br />

as well as the wave number (3.4) a<strong>re</strong> imag<strong>in</strong>ary, <strong>re</strong>sult<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> total <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>re</strong> ection, but no<br />

energy transport. The<strong>re</strong>fo<strong>re</strong> we deem it mean<strong>in</strong>gful to study the simple example of <strong>re</strong> ection<br />

due to an ohmic load. The transmission l<strong>in</strong>e is aga<strong>in</strong> described by the equivalent circuit of<br />

g. 3.1, but has now a nite length and a term<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>re</strong>sistor ( g. 3.4).<br />

Befo<strong>re</strong> we start with evanescence, let us brie y <strong>in</strong>vestigate the behaviour of the pass band<br />

to ga<strong>in</strong> some physical <strong>in</strong>sight. If we solve the di e<strong>re</strong>ntial equations (3.2) for the boundary<br />

condition U2 = RI2 at the end of the l<strong>in</strong>e, we obta<strong>in</strong> the well-known spatial voltage and<br />

cur<strong>re</strong>nt evolution with <strong>re</strong>spect to the voltage across the load,<br />

U = U2 cos k(l , x)+j Z0<br />

R<br />

I = U2<br />

Z0<br />

Z0<br />

R<br />

s<strong>in</strong> k(l , x)<br />

cos k(l , x)+js<strong>in</strong> k(l , x) :<br />

37<br />

K<br />

(3.27)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!