27.12.2012 Views

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

whe<strong>re</strong>as the energy velocity <strong>in</strong> the evanescent <strong>re</strong>gion is<br />

ve<br />

c =<br />

,1 , 2 + , !p<br />

!<br />

2 + , !p<br />

!<br />

If we chose a matched term<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

then (3.46) would <strong>re</strong>duce to<br />

3<strong>Wave</strong> propagation <strong>in</strong> electromagnetic transmission l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

2<br />

, !p<br />

!<br />

2 ,1+ 2 + , !p<br />

!<br />

R = Z0 =<br />

ve<br />

c =<br />

r L 0<br />

s<br />

C 0<br />

2 , 1<br />

2 cosh<br />

1<br />

q 1 , , !p<br />

!<br />

1 , !p<br />

!<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2(X , L)<br />

r<br />

1 , !<br />

!p<br />

! : (3.47)<br />

2<br />

; (3.48)<br />

; (3.49)<br />

which is exactly the group velocity vg = d!=dk <strong>re</strong>fer<strong>re</strong>d to the speed of light. Numerical<br />

examples of the energy velocity <strong>in</strong> dependence on the position and the term<strong>in</strong>ation ratio a<strong>re</strong><br />

given <strong>in</strong> g. 3.7 for the pass band as well as <strong>in</strong> g. 3.8 for the evanescent <strong>re</strong>gion. It is worth<br />

notic<strong>in</strong>g that (3.46) and (3.47) a<strong>re</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous at the plasma f<strong>re</strong>quency. They do not exhibit<br />

a zero, but the nite value<br />

ve(!p)<br />

c<br />

= 2<br />

2+<br />

2 : (3.50)<br />

The gu<strong>re</strong>s clearly show that the energy velocity depends on the position along the transmission<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e. As could have been expected, the local velocity <strong>in</strong> the pass band oscillates<br />

uniformly. In the stop band, however, the velocity nearly vanishes almost everywhe<strong>re</strong>, but<br />

<strong>in</strong>c<strong>re</strong>ases sharply towards the end of the l<strong>in</strong>e with<strong>in</strong> a characteristic distance that is practically<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent of the signal f<strong>re</strong>quency. This behaviour stems from the fact that the sto<strong>re</strong>d<br />

energy per unit length <strong>in</strong> the transmission l<strong>in</strong>e decays exponentially, whe<strong>re</strong>as the transmitted<br />

energy <strong>re</strong>ma<strong>in</strong>s constant due to the absence of losses. Consequently, the energy velocity must<br />

rise as the wave approaches the end of the l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

From a macroscopic po<strong>in</strong>t of view, the local energy velocity is of only m<strong>in</strong>or importance |<br />

an overall energy propagation time through the transmission l<strong>in</strong>e is much mo<strong>re</strong> <strong>in</strong>te<strong>re</strong>st<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This can be de ned via<br />

e =<br />

Z l<br />

and we obta<strong>in</strong> an `e ective' velocity like <strong>in</strong> (3.36),<br />

0<br />

1<br />

ve<br />

ve;e = l<br />

42<br />

e<br />

dx ; (3.51)<br />

: (3.52)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!