27.12.2012 Views

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.7 Turn-on e ects <strong>in</strong> a lossless plasma<br />

Each of the partial waves that make up the function has a dist<strong>in</strong>ct f<strong>re</strong>quency, just like the<br />

steady-state solution (3.69). We can thus immediately write down the transient part of the<br />

cur<strong>re</strong>nt,<br />

It<br />

= , 2 Z 1<br />

s<strong>in</strong> x cos !( )t<br />

d : (3.74)<br />

I0<br />

0<br />

2 + 0 2<br />

Note that <strong>in</strong> (3.74) we used a spatial decomposition of the transient solution and not a<br />

temporal one as might have been expected. This is the second signi cant di e<strong>re</strong>nce of the<br />

p<strong>re</strong>sent approach as compa<strong>re</strong>d with those known from the literatu<strong>re</strong>. All available publications<br />

start from the calculation of the f<strong>re</strong>quency spectrum of the <strong>in</strong>itial conditions. By contrast,<br />

we have determ<strong>in</strong>ed the wave number spectrum of the boundary conditions. Whether one<br />

chooses one possibility or the other is essentially a matter of op<strong>in</strong>ion. In our special case, the<br />

wave number method was particularly appeal<strong>in</strong>g because the transient solution could <strong>re</strong>adily<br />

be found.<br />

We still need the transient solution of the voltage. To that end we <strong>re</strong>call the di e<strong>re</strong>ntial<br />

equations that <strong>re</strong>late cur<strong>re</strong>nt and voltage <strong>in</strong> the evanescent <strong>re</strong>gion,<br />

@U<br />

@x<br />

= ,L0@I<br />

@t<br />

@I !p<br />

= C0<br />

@x<br />

If we <strong>in</strong>sert (3.74) <strong>in</strong> the rst one, we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

Ut<br />

U0L0 = 2 Z 1<br />

0<br />

!<br />

2<br />

, 1 @U<br />

@t :<br />

(3.75)<br />

!( ) cos x s<strong>in</strong> !( )t<br />

d : (3.76)<br />

2 + 0 2<br />

We <strong>re</strong>cognise that the transient voltage also complies with the boundary conditions (3.72)<br />

and vanishes everywhe<strong>re</strong> for t =0. The dispersion <strong>re</strong>lation !( ) used <strong>in</strong> (3.74) and (3.76) is<br />

q<br />

!( )= !p 2 +( c) 2 ; (3.77)<br />

which is <strong>re</strong>adily obta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>vert<strong>in</strong>g (3.44).<br />

We havenow collected all components of the wave and can put together the complete solution.<br />

For the numerical evaluation of the wave functions, however, it is advisable to dispense with<br />

the small physical constants and to use scaled variables. To this end we <strong>in</strong>troduce a normalised<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration variable<br />

= c<br />

!p<br />

(3.78)<br />

and scale the space and time coord<strong>in</strong>ates to the wavelength and period of the plasma f<strong>re</strong>quency,<br />

T = !pt (3.79)<br />

X = !px<br />

c<br />

= !0<br />

!p<br />

51<br />

(3.80)<br />

: (3.81)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!