27.12.2012 Views

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

Wave Propagation in Linear Media | re-examined

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ve/c<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 Z0/R<br />

3<strong>Wave</strong> propagation <strong>in</strong> electromagnetic transmission l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

ve/c<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Z0/R<br />

Figu<strong>re</strong> 3.6: Comparison of the energy velocities obta<strong>in</strong>ed for steady-state signals and short pulses.<br />

The energy velocity thus becomes<br />

ve<br />

c =<br />

1<br />

: (3.39)<br />

2N +1<br />

The <strong>re</strong>sults of (3.39) compa<strong>re</strong>d with the monochromatic case (3.31) a<strong>re</strong> shown <strong>in</strong> g. 3.6 .<br />

The cor<strong>re</strong>spondence is satisfactory for a <strong>re</strong>latively bad term<strong>in</strong>ation, i. e. when Z0=R 1 or<br />

Z0=R 1. If the term<strong>in</strong>ation is close to its optimum Z0=R 1, the energy transfer will<br />

surpass the limit (3.36) with the rst time the pulse <strong>re</strong>aches the <strong>re</strong>sistor.<br />

Remark (Relation between steady-state and pulse signal) The good cor<strong>re</strong>spondence<br />

between the curves <strong>in</strong> g. 3.6 is by no means fortuitous. It is rather due to the<br />

ca<strong>re</strong>ful choice of the energy limit <strong>in</strong> (3.36). In fact, the value 1=e for the still miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

part of the transfer<strong>re</strong>d energy gives exactly the time constant of the cor<strong>re</strong>spond<strong>in</strong>g quasistationary<br />

model. In such an approach the e ect of the <strong>re</strong> ections is collapsed <strong>in</strong>to one<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle parameter determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the overall shape of the output signal just like the charg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of a capacitance. Thus the underly<strong>in</strong>g process of wave propagation completely disappears,<br />

and the curve is smooth, behav<strong>in</strong>g like 1,e ,t= e . The exact model that accounts for the<br />

wave propagation converges to the quasi-stationary model when the<strong>re</strong> a<strong>re</strong> many <strong>re</strong> ections<br />

or only small steps <strong>in</strong> the output signal, i. e. when the term<strong>in</strong>ation is far away from the<br />

optimum.<br />

The <strong>re</strong>ason<strong>in</strong>g just given is of course not the whole truth. After all, the smooth curve <strong>in</strong><br />

the gu<strong>re</strong> was drawn us<strong>in</strong>g (3.31), which was derived from a steady-state signal. The pulse<br />

of the example, however, can be seen as the superposition of monochromatic components.<br />

From Parseval's theo<strong>re</strong>m we know that<br />

Z 1<br />

,1<br />

ji(t)j 2 dt = 1<br />

2<br />

Z 1<br />

jI(!)j<br />

,1<br />

2 d! ; (3.40)<br />

which means that the energy propagation of the signal is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the energy of its<br />

f<strong>re</strong>quency components. If these components travel with a f<strong>re</strong>quency-<strong>in</strong>dependent velocity<br />

ve as <strong>in</strong> our example, then so does the enti<strong>re</strong> energy of the pulse.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!