29.12.2012 Views

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124<br />

not fi sh (Köhler et al. 2002; Moore 1988; Moore et al. 2006a, b; Viarengo et al. 1985a). LMS in blue mussels<br />

is correlated with oxygen and nitrogen radical scavenging capacity (TOSC), protein syn<strong>the</strong>sis, scope for<br />

growth and larval viability and inversely correlated with DNA damage (incidence <strong>of</strong> micronuclei), lysosomal<br />

swelling, lipidosis and lip<strong>of</strong>uscinosis (Dailianis et al. 2003; Kalpaxis et al. 2004; Krishnakumar et al. 1994;<br />

Moore et al. 2004a, b, 2006a; Regoli 2000; Ringwood et al. 2004). In fi sh liver, LMS is strongly correlated<br />

with a suppression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activity <strong>of</strong> macrophage aggregates, and lipidosis (Broeg et al. 2005).<br />

A conceptual mechanistic model has been developed linking lysosomal damage and autophagic dysfunction<br />

with injury to cells, tissues and <strong>the</strong> whole animal; and <strong>the</strong> complementary use <strong>of</strong> cell-based bioenergetic<br />

computational model <strong>of</strong> molluscan hepatopancreatic cells that simulates lysosomal and cellular reactions to<br />

pollutants has also been demonstrated (Allen & McVeigh 2004; Lowe 1988; Moore et al. 2006a, b, c). Various<br />

biomarker indices and decision support systems have been developed based on LMS as “guiding” parameter<br />

to interpret <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r biomarkers (Figure 3.10) which show “bell-shaped” responses since<br />

it refl ects deleterious effects <strong>of</strong> various classes <strong>of</strong> contaminants in an integrative linear manner (Dagnino et<br />

al. 2007, Broeg et al. 2005, Broeg & Lehtonen 2006).<br />

Figure 3.10. Progression <strong>of</strong> biological effects detected on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> LMS in individual fl ounder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

German Bight (Broeg et al. 2005).<br />

Confounding factors<br />

LMS is an integrative indicator <strong>of</strong> individual health status and will be affected also by non-contaminant<br />

factors such as severe nutritional deprivation, severe hyper<strong>the</strong>rmia, prolonged hypoxia, and liver infections<br />

associated with high densities <strong>of</strong> macrophage aggregates (Moore et al. 1980; Moore et al. 2007, Broeg<br />

2010). Processing for neutral red retention (NRR) in samples <strong>of</strong> molluscs adapted to low salinity environments<br />

should use ei<strong>the</strong>r physiological saline adjusted to <strong>the</strong> equivalent ionic strength or else use ambient fi ltered<br />

seawater. The major confounding factor in respect <strong>of</strong> biomonitoring is <strong>the</strong> adverse effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fi nal stage <strong>of</strong><br />

gametogenesis and spawning in mussel, which is a naturally stressful process (Bayne et al. 1978). In general,<br />

this period should be avoided anyway for sampling purposes, as most physiological processes and related<br />

biomarkers are adversely affected (Moore et al. 2004b).<br />

However, for fi sh, spawning has only a minimal effect on LMS and does not mask harmful chemical induced

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!