29.12.2012 Views

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GES and classifi cation method<br />

A problem related to non-indigenous species is that once a marine organism has been introduced and<br />

established in a new environment it is nearly impossible to eradicate it. The consequence is that assessing<br />

a status <strong>of</strong> an area as bad depending on <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> invasive species means that <strong>the</strong> area will stay in a<br />

bad status without a possibility <strong>of</strong> improvement.<br />

The goal is to minimize human mediated introductions <strong>of</strong> non-indigenous species. GES boundary for<br />

non-indigenous species should be ‘no new introductions’. For <strong>the</strong> indicator in question <strong>the</strong> GES boundary<br />

should be ‘No new non-indigenous species with known impacts’. This means that when an assessment<br />

is made only <strong>the</strong> species, which have been introduced after <strong>the</strong> previous assessment will be taken into<br />

account. GES is met when fur<strong>the</strong>r impacts from NIS are minimized, with <strong>the</strong> ultimate goal <strong>of</strong> no adverse<br />

alterations to <strong>the</strong> ecosystems.<br />

A contrasting point against <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> new arrivals only is that some NIS are known not to cause<br />

any impacts for a long time and when environmental conditions change <strong>the</strong>y suddenly become invasive.<br />

Hence at least <strong>the</strong> species that were shown to have BPL≤1 should be reassessed. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, 6 years does<br />

not even leave enough time for research on impacts in situ.<br />

Increasing biopollution indicates additional stress for <strong>the</strong> ecosystem. It is a signal <strong>of</strong> failed management<br />

concerning introductions <strong>of</strong> NIS.<br />

Methodology for indicator calculation<br />

The assessment is performed on 4 levels;<br />

1. abundance and distribution (ADR)<br />

2. impacts on communities<br />

3. impacts on habitats<br />

4. impacts on ecosystem functioning<br />

and should be delivered on a defi ned aquatic area (e.g. a coastal lagoon, <strong>of</strong>fshore sand bank, or even<br />

entire sub-basins) and for a defi ned period <strong>of</strong> time. After ADR is estimated, it is related to <strong>the</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

bioinvasion impacts, in order to reach <strong>the</strong> biopollution level index ranging from 0 to 4:<br />

(0) no impact<br />

(1) weak impact<br />

(2) moderate impact<br />

(3) strong impact<br />

(4) massive impact.<br />

211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!