- Page 1:
Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings
- Page 4 and 5:
2 Helsinki Commission Katajanokanla
- Page 6 and 7:
4 4.16. Cumulative impact on benthi
- Page 8 and 9:
6 descriptions of the indicators. T
- Page 10 and 11:
8 The CORESET expert group on biodi
- Page 12 and 13:
10 fi sh stocks and change in diet,
- Page 14 and 15:
12 Figure 2.3. The prevalence of pr
- Page 16 and 17:
14 Seasonal changes in blubber thic
- Page 18 and 19:
16 Blubber thickness suggestions Bl
- Page 20 and 21:
18 Weaknesses/gaps Monitoring of th
- Page 22 and 23:
20 2.3. Population growth rate of m
- Page 24 and 25:
22 Annual adult survival 1 0,95 0,9
- Page 26 and 27:
24 Existing monitoring data Informa
- Page 28 and 29:
26 References Bäcklin, B. M. 2011.
- Page 30 and 31:
28 Reproduction in the Baltic eagle
- Page 32 and 33:
30 Breeding success The proportion
- Page 34 and 35:
32 of the real number of nestlings
- Page 36 and 37:
34 Gaps and weaknesses Minimum dete
- Page 38 and 39:
36 2.5. Abundance of wintering popu
- Page 40 and 41:
38 Table 2.10. Pressures affecting
- Page 42 and 43:
40 Refrences Skov et al. (2000) Bir
- Page 44 and 45:
42 termined by application of the 7
- Page 46 and 47:
44 Approach for defi ning GES All s
- Page 48 and 49:
46 Sampling It is suggested to incl
- Page 50 and 51:
48 2.7. Fish population abundance 2
- Page 52 and 53:
50 Coastal Fish - Community Abundan
- Page 54 and 55:
52 When a reference data set cannot
- Page 56 and 57:
54 well, but were not included in t
- Page 58 and 59:
56 Weighting For Nordic Costal mult
- Page 60 and 61:
58 12. Current monitoring Monitored
- Page 62 and 63:
60 Błeńska M., Osowiecki A., Kra
- Page 64 and 65:
62 10. Spatial considerations Fucus
- Page 66 and 67:
64 2.15. Trend in the arrival of ne
- Page 68 and 69:
66 jectives is to reach “No intro
- Page 70 and 71:
68 Sweden Figure 2.23 shows the rat
- Page 72 and 73:
70 Strengths and weaknesses of data
- Page 74 and 75:
72 need to be revisited in light of
- Page 76 and 77:
74 Considering the data set availab
- Page 78 and 79:
76 In Denmark, the highest contamin
- Page 80 and 81:
78 Status of a compound on internat
- Page 82 and 83:
80 A temporal analysis (EU-RAR 2006
- Page 84 and 85:
82 Pathways of PFOS to the Baltic e
- Page 86 and 87:
84 In regions less affected by anth
- Page 88 and 89:
86 3.4. Polychlorinated biphenyls a
- Page 90 and 91:
88 actions related to the environme
- Page 92 and 93:
90 The CORESET expert group decided
- Page 94 and 95:
92 pheric deposition pattern (lowes
- Page 96 and 97:
94 3.5. Polyaromatic hydrocarbons (
- Page 98 and 99:
96 GES boundaries and matrix Existi
- Page 100 and 101:
98 Quality Assurance of PAH metabol
- Page 102 and 103:
100 Ariese F, Burgers I, Oudhoff K,
- Page 104 and 105:
102 GES boundaries and matrices Exi
- Page 106 and 107:
104 3.7. Cesium-137 Authors: Jürge
- Page 108 and 109:
106 Figure 3.5. Average surface lev
- Page 110 and 111:
108 Temporal trends in concentratio
- Page 112 and 113:
110 Other important sources are glo
- Page 114 and 115:
112 Conceptual model of the sources
- Page 116 and 117:
114 3.8 Tributyltin (TBT) and the i
- Page 118 and 119:
116 GES boundaries and matrix Exist
- Page 120 and 121:
118 Monitoring the compound Status
- Page 122 and 123:
120 Recommendation TBT measurements
- Page 124 and 125:
122 3. Frogs have been shown to app
- Page 126 and 127:
124 not fi sh (Köhler et al. 2002;
- Page 128 and 129:
126 The use of different fi sh spec
- Page 130 and 131:
128 Kirchin, M.A. Moore, M.N. Dean,
- Page 132 and 133:
130 3.11. Fish Disease Index: Exter
- Page 134 and 135:
132 Confounding factors The multifa
- Page 136 and 137:
134 analyses ICES data from various
- Page 138 and 139:
136 An EAC is the threshold beyond
- Page 140 and 141:
138 3.12. Micronucleus test Authors
- Page 142 and 143:
140 main nuclei were not counted as
- Page 144 and 145:
142 ing national data sets. Note: t
- Page 146 and 147:
144 Baršienė J. Rybakovas A. 2006
- Page 148 and 149:
146 3.13 A. Reproductive disorders
- Page 150 and 151:
148 dead larvae can be induced by s
- Page 152 and 153:
150 Strand, J, Dahllöf, I. (2005).
- Page 154 and 155:
152 of contaminants in sediments wi
- Page 156 and 157:
154 Eriksson Wiklund, A-K., and Sun
- Page 158 and 159:
156 4. Candidate indicators for bio
- Page 160 and 161:
158 Zooplankton-phytoplankton bioma
- Page 162 and 163: 160 4.2. By-catch of marine mammals
- Page 164 and 165: 162 4.3. Impacts of anthropogenic u
- Page 166 and 167: 164 4.4. Fatty-acid composition of
- Page 168 and 169: 166 7. Use of the indicator in prev
- Page 170 and 171: 168 10. Spatial considerations Balt
- Page 172 and 173: 170 4.10. Large fi sh individuals f
- Page 174 and 175: 172 11. Temporal considerations Sam
- Page 176 and 177: 174 7. Use of the indicator in prev
- Page 178 and 179: 176 7. Use of the indicator in prev
- Page 180 and 181: 178 A proposal for an approach to a
- Page 182 and 183: 180 Technical data Metadata This is
- Page 184 and 185: 182 F igure 4.1. Map showing the cu
- Page 186 and 187: 184 4.17. Biomass of copepods 1. Wo
- Page 188 and 189: 186 4.19. Zooplankton species diver
- Page 190 and 191: 188 indirectly impacted by eutrophi
- Page 192 and 193: 190 Notes for the GES boundary The
- Page 194 and 195: 192 Step 3: Prepare a list of speci
- Page 196 and 197: 194 4.22. Phytoplankton diversity 1
- Page 198 and 199: 196 4. Policy relevance Nonylphenol
- Page 200 and 201: 198 among different studies/measure
- Page 202 and 203: 200 4.27. EROD/CYP1A induction The
- Page 204 and 205: 202 5.1. Summary of all supplementa
- Page 206 and 207: 204 Table 5.1. (continues) Suppleme
- Page 208 and 209: 206 5.5. Biopollution level index 1
- Page 210 and 211: 208 NIS for aquaculture purposes. O
- Page 214 and 215: 212 Figure 5.3. The scheme for asse
- Page 216 and 217: 214 5.6. Organochlorine compounds G
- Page 218 and 219: 216 EU Directive 2008/105/ EC Daugh
- Page 220 and 221: 218 Table 5.4. Monitoring of HCB, H
- Page 222: www.helcom.fi