29.12.2012 Views

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48<br />

2.7. Fish population abundance<br />

2.8. Mean metric length <strong>of</strong> key fi sh species<br />

2.9. Fish community diversity<br />

2.10. Proportion <strong>of</strong> large fi sh individuals in <strong>the</strong> community<br />

2.11. Abundance <strong>of</strong> fi sh key trophic groups<br />

2.12. Fish community trophic index<br />

Authors and acknowledged persons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coastal fi sh indicators: Magnus Appelberg, Jens Olsson, Håkan<br />

Wennhage, Antti Lappalainen, Kaj Ådjers, Markus Vetemaa, Outi Heikinheimo, Adam Leijk, Atis Minde,<br />

Iwona Psuty and all Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>HELCOM</strong> FISH-PRO <strong>project</strong>.<br />

Introduction<br />

This description <strong>of</strong> core indicators focuses on <strong>the</strong> work done in <strong>the</strong> <strong>HELCOM</strong> FISH-PRO <strong>project</strong> (<strong>HELCOM</strong><br />

2011). The core indicators identifi ed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>HELCOM</strong> <strong>CORESET</strong> <strong>project</strong> are meant to apply to a wider set <strong>of</strong><br />

species and methodologies, developed elsewhere (e.g. ICES working groups, LIFE+ <strong>project</strong> MARMONI, etc)<br />

or in <strong>the</strong> second phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>CORESET</strong> <strong>project</strong> in 2012. Some elements <strong>of</strong> that work can be seen in Chapter<br />

4 <strong>of</strong> this <strong>report</strong>, where candidate indicators are described.<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> coastal fi sh indicators<br />

Indeces for coastal fi sh were developed for <strong>the</strong> following biodiversity levels within D1.<br />

Table 2.11. Proposed core indicators and <strong>the</strong>ir links to <strong>the</strong> MSFD GES criteria.<br />

GES criteria Coastal fi sh Indeces Proposed core indicators<br />

1.2 Species Abundance Index Fish population abundance<br />

1.3 Species Demographic Index Mean metric length <strong>of</strong> key fi sh species<br />

1.6 Community Diversity Index, Fish community diversity, Proportion <strong>of</strong> large fi sh<br />

Community Size Index<br />

individuals in <strong>the</strong> community<br />

1.6 Community Abundance Index Abundance <strong>of</strong> fi sh key trophic groups<br />

1.7 Community Trophic Index Fish communitytrophic index<br />

Indices for coastal fi sh community status estimate changes over time within one monitoring area. The indices<br />

can potentially also be used for estimating differences among geographic areas, provided that <strong>the</strong><br />

same monitoring method is applied in all areas to be compared (<strong>HELCOM</strong> 2011).<br />

Coastal Fish - Species Abundance Index (D1.2.1)<br />

The index estimates <strong>the</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> a key fi sh species in Baltic Sea coastal areas, such as Perch (Perca<br />

fl uviatilis). Perch is a freshwater species that commonly dominates quantitatively coastal fi sh communities<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Baltic Sea (Ådjers et al. 2006). As such, areas <strong>of</strong> good ecological status generally have strong<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Perch (Eriksson et al. 2011). The species is a piscivore in <strong>the</strong> adult stage and an appreciated<br />

target for both small scale commercial fi sheries and recreational fi shing (Swedish Board <strong>of</strong> Fisheries 2011).<br />

The index refl ects <strong>the</strong> integrated effects <strong>of</strong> recruitment and mortality. Recruitment success is expected to<br />

be mainly infl uenced by climate and quality <strong>of</strong> recruitment habitats. Mortality is infl uenced by fi shing, but<br />

potentially also by predation from apex predators, such as seals, sea birds and fi sh.<br />

Policy relevance: The index will show if <strong>the</strong> abundance and productivity <strong>of</strong> Perch is at appropriate level for<br />

supporting coastal ecosystem function, focusing on food provision but also refl ecting <strong>the</strong> trophic state. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!