29.12.2012 Views

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

170<br />

4.10. Large fi sh individuals from fi shery-based data sources<br />

1. Working team<br />

MARMONI Life –<strong>project</strong> (Antti Lappalainen et al.)<br />

2. Name <strong>of</strong> candidate indicator<br />

Large fi sh individuals (complement)<br />

3. Unit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> candidate indicator<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong> large fi sh individuals in fi sh populations.<br />

Mean size <strong>of</strong> sexual maturation.<br />

4. Description <strong>of</strong> proposed indicator<br />

The original core indicator “Large fi sh individuals” is monitored in <strong>HELCOM</strong> FISH <strong>project</strong> by gill nets.<br />

Perch and some Cyprinids typically form <strong>the</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catch. O<strong>the</strong>r data sources, such as coastal trawl<br />

surveys, can be used in order to get population level data from a wider group <strong>of</strong> species The fi sh catch<br />

data collected under <strong>the</strong> EU Data Collection Regulation is also a source which can be used for this indicator.<br />

A part <strong>of</strong> this data, e.g sampling <strong>of</strong> predatory species from herring traps, covers all size classes and<br />

can be treated here as fi shery independent data.<br />

These data can be used e.g. to calculate:<br />

Proportion <strong>of</strong> fi sh larger than <strong>the</strong> mean size <strong>of</strong> fi rst sexual maturation<br />

mean size at fi rst sexual maturation<br />

These issues (1 and 2) are closely linked to effects <strong>of</strong> fi shing pressure on fi sh populations and on population<br />

level biodiversity.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Marmoni –<strong>project</strong>, Finland (FGFRI) will shortly evaluate <strong>the</strong> usability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fi shery data (EU Data<br />

Collection regulation) and national trawl survey data for this kind <strong>of</strong> indicators. This work will be focused<br />

on pike-perch. In Estonia (EMI), <strong>the</strong>re are long time series <strong>of</strong> trawling survey data, which might be used<br />

to assess <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> fi shery on pike-perch stocks. The usability <strong>of</strong> coastal commercial catch data to<br />

monitor <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> coastal fi sh stocks will be evaluated out, too. Latvia has long time series <strong>of</strong> trawling<br />

survey data, too, and <strong>the</strong> data will be evaluated in <strong>the</strong> Marmoni –<strong>project</strong>.<br />

10. Spatial considerations<br />

Valid in <strong>the</strong> entire Baltic Sea.<br />

11. Temporal considerations<br />

12. Current monitoring<br />

Fishery dependent data (catch samples from commercial fi shery) is collected by all countries under <strong>the</strong><br />

EU Data Collection Regulation. Trawling surveys are also carried out in several countries around <strong>the</strong> Baltic<br />

Sea.<br />

13. Proposed or perceived target setting approach with a short justifi cation.<br />

GES boundaries not set yet. Reference conditions could be based on fi shery independent monitoring<br />

results from earlier time period(s). There is also a general principle that every fi sh individual should have a<br />

chance to spawn at least once before <strong>the</strong>y are targets for effective fi shery

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!