Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project
Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project
Interim report of the HELCOM CORESET project
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
50<br />
Coastal Fish – Community Abundance Index (D1.6.2)<br />
The index is based on estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> two different functional groups: Abundance <strong>of</strong> Cyprinids<br />
and Abundance <strong>of</strong> Piscivores, and refl ects <strong>the</strong> integrated effects <strong>of</strong> recruitment and mortality <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> species included in each functional group. Recruitment success is expected to mainly be infl uenced by<br />
<strong>the</strong> quality and availability <strong>of</strong> recruitment habitats, climate and eutrophication. Mortality is infl uenced by<br />
fi shing, but predation from o<strong>the</strong>r animals, such as seals, sea birds and fi sh are also perceivable. The two<br />
metrics included in <strong>the</strong> index are expected to differ in <strong>the</strong>ir responses to anthropogenic pressure factors, in<br />
that Abundance <strong>of</strong> Cyprinids is expected to show <strong>the</strong> strongest link to eutrophication and Abundance <strong>of</strong><br />
Piscivores <strong>the</strong> strongest relationship to fi shing pressure.<br />
Policy relevance: The index will indicate whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> abundance and productivity <strong>of</strong> coastal fi sh<br />
communities is at appropriate level for supporting coastal ecosystem function and resilience, including food<br />
provision for man and o<strong>the</strong>r marine organisms. In areas where <strong>the</strong> index does not signal good environmental<br />
status, GES may be achieved by restoration <strong>of</strong> recruitment habitats for piscivores, reduction <strong>of</strong> nutrient<br />
loads, and by regulating mortality <strong>of</strong> piscivores by reducing fi shing pressure and predation from apex<br />
predators.<br />
Coastal Fish - Community Trophic Index (D1.7.1)<br />
The index refl ects <strong>the</strong> general trophic structure at <strong>the</strong> community level and is based on estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> fi sh at different trophic levels. Alternatively, estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> piscivores in <strong>the</strong><br />
fi sh community may be used.<br />
The index provides an integrated measure <strong>of</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> trophic state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fi sh community. Typically,<br />
very low values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> index may refl ect high fi shing pressure on piscivores (Pauly et al. 1998) and/or<br />
domination <strong>of</strong> species favoured by eutrophic conditions. Since high levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> index also may refl ect a<br />
decreased abundance <strong>of</strong> some naturally dominating non-piscivore species <strong>the</strong> index has both an upper and<br />
a lower boundary.<br />
Policy relevance: The indicator will show if <strong>the</strong> trophic structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coastal fi sh community is at appropriate<br />
level for supporting coastal ecosystem function, including ecosystem resilience. The indicator refl ects<br />
<strong>the</strong> general state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fi sh community, and is likely to be closely linked to fi shing pressure as well as eutrophication.<br />
In areas with sub-GES conditions, actions should target <strong>the</strong> species level.<br />
Method(s) used to test <strong>the</strong> indicators<br />
The metrics on which each index is based have previously been used for assessing <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> coastal fi sh<br />
communities in Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania based on data coastal fi sh monitoring programs<br />
(as analyzed within <strong>the</strong> <strong>HELCOM</strong> Fish PRO group; <strong>HELCOM</strong> 2011).<br />
The suggested metrics were identifi ed after evaluation <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> parameters potentially refl ecting<br />
coastal fi sh community status. The selection <strong>of</strong> metrics was based on multivariate analyses (PCA) <strong>of</strong> monitoring<br />
data where <strong>the</strong> signal strength, biological relevance and redundancy <strong>of</strong> individual parameters as<br />
suggested by Rice and Rochet (2005) were assessed (as analyzed within <strong>the</strong> <strong>HELCOM</strong> Fish PRO group; HEL-<br />
COM 2011). In addition, <strong>the</strong> biological relevance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> metrics was mainly evaluated based on empirical<br />
observations.<br />
Relationship to anthropogenic pressures<br />
The relationship between metrics and anthropogenic pressures was assessed using a data set covering <strong>the</strong><br />
Bothnian Bay, Bothnian Sea, Gulf <strong>of</strong> Finland and <strong>the</strong> Central Baltic Sea. Samples covered areas with different<br />
levels <strong>of</strong> natural and anthropogenic environmental pressures, and <strong>the</strong> relationship was analysed using<br />
distance-based linear modeling (DISTLM as implemented in PERMANOVA+ <strong>of</strong> PRIMER v6). The results in